Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-03
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Tue, 27 August 2013 22:52 UTC
Return-Path: <hauke@hauke-m.de>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F62311E81B5 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avvvGy734ppb for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hauke-m.de (Hauke-2-pt.tunnel.tserv6.fra1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0a:465::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BD011E80F5 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hauke-m.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC6A8F62; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:52:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hauke-m.de
Received: from hauke-m.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hauke-m.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqRSWWCmPsoq; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:52:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:447:c053:3d6c:842a:78f] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:447:c053:3d6c:842a:78f]) by hauke-m.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BF37857F; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:52:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <521D2DB6.4070808@hauke-m.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:52:38 +0200
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Keoh, Sye Loong" <SyeLoong.Keoh@glasgow.ac.uk>
References: <5D963903D7084F1386D7F2EEA602F054@KeohSyeLoongPC> <521B695C.9000802@hauke-m.de> <0980963B8E304407A86658C9FDB2DC66@KeohSyeLoongPC>
In-Reply-To: <0980963B8E304407A86658C9FDB2DC66@KeohSyeLoongPC>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: lwip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-03
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:52:53 -0000
Hi Sye Loong, I am using a simulated sensor node in cooja. wismote is a simulated wireless sensor node which simulates a TI MSP430 with 16kB RAM and 128 kB Rom, so this suites in the class 1 category. Currently I am still in the state of getting tinydtls working on the TI MSP430. Hauke On 08/27/2013 03:32 AM, Keoh, Sye Loong wrote: > Hi Hauke, > > What is a wismote? Do you have a use case for your work? and what are > the assumptions of the nodes in your network? Are they class 1 devices > as defined in the Terminology draft? > > Great that you are willing to contribute! > > cheers > Sye Loong > > -----Original Message----- From: Hauke Mehrtens > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 10:42 PM > To: Sye Loong Keoh > Cc: lwip@ietf.org ; hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net ; sandeep.kumar@philips.com > Subject: [SPAM?] Re: [Lwip] Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-03 > > Hi Sye Loong, > > I am currently at implementing reordering, it seams to work, but it is > not committed to github yet. > > I am also sending only one message at a time, so a flight contains many > UDP packages. > > I am currently trying to get it to work in cooja on a simulated wismote, > the psk handshake already works, but I still have problems with the > ECDH_ECDSA handshake, something is probably wrong in the ecc code, on > x86 it works. Cooja also has a nice tool which shows the stack usage of > the application running. > > Too bad you can not give me access to your modified tinydtls version. > > Most of my code is at github, it misses some of the things that I am > currently working on and that are not cleaned up right now. > > I want to do some measurements similar to the ones, you did for the psk > case with ECDH_ECDSA for my master's thesis and I would like to get them > integrated into the draft. > > Hauke > > On 08/26/2013 12:04 PM, Keoh, Sye Loong wrote: >> Hi Hauke, >> >> Thank you for your interest in our draft. It is great to hear that you >> are extending TinyDTLS with raw public key support, and this is indeed >> the contribution that we needed in this document, as we only had >> performance and implementation details of PSK in TinyDTLS. >> >> At least in your implementation, we needed the re-ordering because >> messages were not sent using message flights. Each message is sent >> individually. >> >> I am sorry that the the modified TinyDTLS code cannot be made available >> due to some constraints that we have. But, we can discuss specific needs >> that you have. >> When you compile and flash the application to the hardware, you can get >> the RAM size measurement. >> >> Would be great if you could share your implementation details and >> measurements with us, so that they can be incorporated into our Internet >> Draft. >> >> cheers >> Sye Loong >> >>>>> >> Hi Hannes, >> >> I have some notes on >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-03 >> >> I am working on tinyDTLS and came across some problems. I extended it to >> support raw public keys with TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM_8 on the >> SECP256R1 curve. The ECC code just supports this specific curve. >> >> The ClientHello without a cookie is now 99 Bytes big (value in UDP >> header) and on ieee802.15.4 it has to be fragmented somewhere. But to do >> fragmentation we have to store a state somewhere. >> >> For retransmission, instead of storing the whole message you could store >> the data which is needed to recreate the message. Data like the server >> certificate already has to be stored somewhere. I am planing to >> implement this. >> >> We have a high memory consumption in the handshake process, you could >> make it possible to be able to just do one handshake at a time, but have >> more than one DTLS session open at a time. All these DTLS session will >> then share a common memory space to store their temporary handshake >> data. I am planing to implement this. >> >> If you have a pretty reliable medium you could leave out implementation >> of reordering, the other peer will resend the messages if a message will >> be lost and then the client could start at the position where the >> package was lost again. This could save some ram to store the messages. >> >> Is the code of the modified tinyDTLS version and a more detailed >> description of the setup available somewhere? I am planing to so some >> measurements with tinyDTLS and raw public keys. How was the RAM size >> measurement done? >> >> As already discussed in the meeting the sizes for the tls implementation >> are pretty big. I haven't implemented a generic ASN.1 parser, I am just >> supporting one type of raw public key, so I am doing a memcmp() to >> ensure it is the one I excepted, then there is the public key at a >> constant offset. >> >> My tinyDTLS implementation with raw public keys and >> TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CCM_8 on the SECP256R1 curve is about 30% >> bigger then the version just supporting PSK cipher. This measurement was >> done on a AMD64 system without any compiler optimization for size. I am >> planing to do a better measurement. >> >> Hauke >> >> [0]: https://github.com/hauke/tinydtls/tree/ecdh-merge >
- [Lwip] Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal… Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [Lwip] Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-min… Keoh, Sye Loong
- Re: [Lwip] Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-min… Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-… Keoh, Sye Loong
- Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-… Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-… Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [Lwip] Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-min… Sye Loong Keoh
- Re: [Lwip] Notes on draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-min… Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [Lwip] [SPAM?] Re: Notes on draft-tschofenig-… Sye Loong Keoh