[Lwip] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02.txt]
"Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Tue, 27 February 2018 17:18 UTC
Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE88D12895E for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:18:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKymdKpWDPmX for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA1D124F57 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.39.4]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w1RHHvSr039312 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:17:57 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715B81D53C1; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:17:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 10.192.9.3 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:17:29 +0100
Message-ID: <428de4b321f8e8bd2dd65658795d0c0f.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:17:29 +0100
From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: lwip@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at violet
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: ACL matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:17:57 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/w9ziJ_X3-WelhP4LGtzUoAvyfFQ>
Subject: [Lwip] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:18:03 -0000
Dear LWIG WG, Please find below the main pointers to our last revision (-02) of the TCP draft. Comments are very much welcome. See you in London! Carles (on behalf of all authors) ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02.txt From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Date: Tue, February 27, 2018 6:06 pm To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: lwip@ietf.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Light-Weight Implementation Guidance WG of the IETF. Title : TCP Usage Guidance in the Internet of Things (IoT) Authors : Carles Gomez Jon Crowcroft Michael Scharf Filename : draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2018-02-27 Abstract: This document provides guidance on how to implement and use the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) in Constrained-Node Networks (CNNs), which are a characterstic of the Internet of Things (IoT). Such environments require a lightweight TCP implementation and may not make use of optional functionality. This document explains a number of known and deployed techniques to simplify a TCP stack as well as corresponding tradeoffs. The objective is to help embedded developers with decisions on which TCP features to use. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
- [Lwip] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constraine… internet-drafts
- [Lwip] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-cons… Carles Gomez Montenegro