IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-messageflag-mailboxattribute-05

Daniel Eggert <deggert@apple.com> Sat, 09 August 2025 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <deggert@apple.com>
X-Original-To: mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7455202DF1 for <mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Aug 2025 02:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arm_gm09Nn9U for <mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Aug 2025 02:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vib-mx01.apple.com (vib-mx01.apple.com [17.132.96.0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51ADD5202DD3 for <mailmaint@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Aug 2025 02:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vb11p01nt-mtap01.apple.com (vb11p01nt-mtap01.apple.com [100.84.69.178]) by vb11p01nt-mxp01.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.27.20250130 64bit (built Jan 30 2025)) with ESMTPS id <0T0Q0OB9I05BCV00@vb11p01nt-mxp01.apple.com> for mailmaint@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-08-09_03,2025-08-06_01,2025-03-28_01
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=cc : content-type : date : from : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : references : subject : to; s=20180706; bh=XXqXkuDy3xHUw4t3wyQWpRLAE9sLMdW19lzEydSo1sM=; b=h06fqaJ9P/hquQdP+jYUkPbNa0EeQx5TWkxfkiIXcpfIb6n7gCNR5he0Fmt5ntqbK3Rr vSenNIHGWDs569UB0E26DieJPPkuSC1VPW7U2CkGsk0kCYJ/QHbjwNTt5aTZr/4QvpSk G7hP3IPbQLSKRZqpvGJVxdZ8XwAzfp2X6MUW7WizNl+na+QcfKxb/iBuCxJbQhidHnte 1uv3J8+5kSlxsv96cSSLa/coNHWLUowI2pI9p9cSY/8FXet+90c/DbvsLFbbLsFiz9Nx uHLxU8q8/L6Y3yDWQ7n8N1GPzSX5ChBq2bRcikzNVNiADvxvpKlZKbGPh814XhvklZRY HA==
Received: from am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com (am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com [100.85.69.141]) by vb11p01nt-mtap01.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.27.20250130 64bit (built Jan 30 2025)) with ESMTPS id <0T0Q0M6BQ05B8000@vb11p01nt-mtap01.apple.com>; Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com by am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.27.20250130 64bit (built Jan 30 2025)) id <0T0Q1SH0005AVL00@am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com>; Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: e86c8765869d527fcaa13c2690103df3
X-Va-E-CD: a800c748ce019442b5daaace7ca45a0c
X-Va-R-CD: 48e95bf39abcd26b955a8aaeeafdd14f
X-Va-ID: d9e5fa3d-3753-4f9a-a52e-ffd40cf97267
X-Va-CD: 0
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: e86c8765869d527fcaa13c2690103df3
X-V-E-CD: a800c748ce019442b5daaace7ca45a0c
X-V-R-CD: 48e95bf39abcd26b955a8aaeeafdd14f
X-V-ID: 0c6d8081-ac7a-4133-95b3-9b72e1efb631
X-V-CD: 0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-08-09_03,2025-08-06_01,2025-03-28_01
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [10.106.45.17]) by am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.27.20250130 64bit (built Jan 30 2025)) with ESMTPSA id <0T0Q1S11A059BV00@am11p01nt-mmpp03.apple.com>; Sat, 09 Aug 2025 09:39:10 +0000 (GMT)
From: Daniel Eggert <deggert@apple.com>
Message-id: <C7D9A979-EE64-46F2-9302-EB1C462C3A36@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_58257988-051F-42DB-A452-8CBD7AA768FF"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.100.1.1.1\))
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:39:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <a391cb05-62ab-4665-bfec-52f220461326@localhost:3000>
To: Neil Jenkins <neilj=40fastmailteam.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <21e341fd-cc03-4365-a098-a357addf752f@fastmail.com> <1B583328-86F5-4689-9FA8-A93FCF4B5F30@beonex.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.100.1.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: 6J63PQNCO6VBGYSNZYXPCZGW3UYJ7TYZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6J63PQNCO6VBGYSNZYXPCZGW3UYJ7TYZ
X-MailFrom: deggert@apple.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Mail Maintenance WG <mailmaint@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-messageflag-mailboxattribute-05
List-Id: Mail Maintenance <mailmaint.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mailmaint/41oR2y2429x-d0lF5Hovn_mROgg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mailmaint>
List-Help: <mailto:mailmaint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mailmaint-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mailmaint@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mailmaint-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mailmaint-leave@ietf.org>


> On Aug 9, 2025, at 2:33 AM, Neil Jenkins <neilj=40fastmailteam.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025, at 01:40, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> The only nit that I have is that the Abstract uses the term "mailbox name", but I think we want that to say "mailbox attribute".
> 
> Yes, I agree it should be mailbox attribute.

Other places we write “mailbox name attributes”. And the registry is also called “IMAP Mailbox Name Attributes”.

Should I change it to “mailbox name attributes”?

/Daniel


> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025, at 10:28, Ben Bucksch wrote:
>> Given that the notion of a "thread" is explicitly server-dependent, the client cannot know which messages are part of the same "thread", and therefore has no way to clear the flag for all messages in the thread.
> 
> This is defined in the document:
> For thread identification purposes, messages are considered part of the same thread when they share the same thread identifier as defined in [RFC8474 <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mailmaint-messageflag-mailboxattribute-06.html#RFC8474>] Section 5.2 for IMAP or [RFC8621 <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mailmaint-messageflag-mailboxattribute-06.html#RFC8621>], Section 3 for JMAP.
> 
> Cheers,
> Neil.
> -- 
> mailmaint mailing list -- mailmaint@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mailmaint-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status