[mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wrong-recipient-01
Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Thu, 24 July 2025 12:53 UTC
Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405894A4AD99 for <mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 05:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=episteme.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRvzAM0wf57q for <mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 05:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422E44A4ACD1 for <mailmaint@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 05:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.0.0.2] (unknown [31.130.238.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bnrWt5JrpznqGr; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:52:58 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=episteme.net; s=mail; t=1753361580; bh=atFWqzgdFvoDX+NvMm01BsBgFEa5jj0bM95QQiOWt5E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=FIzng1wa/fUR51KqBKND3VxrPBXx6g35KLVgXw8LuaDCozwWzePqg/zyvrVhc91ei CbQR2OJm0HA2Vi9dNUb43dWnIQy4X7j3N4bkWQvtzr9RkrBW2S+q+7/50TOrHRkUXm E67FtraLNsu2geAM2DipAc07Iz9X2vn7dxCJ4Qlk=
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:52:56 +0200
Message-ID: <FFE5D315-A02D-4576-9C68-42B1B7F9FEC6@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <4f9a4daa-b3b9-4d86-a9a0-9f483ab28f18@fastmail.com>
References: <4f9a4daa-b3b9-4d86-a9a0-9f483ab28f18@fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_1E5365BF-906F-428E-915A-3BEC71EB7CBE_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"plain":[394,809],"uuid":"71E630D7-DAE9-46C6-8D47-7D1676CB4245"}]
X-Synology-Spam-Flag: no
X-Synology-Spam-Status: score=-0.1, required 6, FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT 0, FROM_HAS_DN 0, FROM_EQ_ENVFROM 0, MIME_GOOD -0.1, MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM 0, NO_RECEIVED -0.001, RCVD_COUNT_ZERO 0, HTML_MESSAGE 0.001, MISSING_XM_UA 0, __THREADED 0, HTML_MISSING_CTYPE 0, __NOT_A_PERSON 0, TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL 0, __HDRS_LCASE_KNOWN 0, RCPT_COUNT_TWO 0, __PDS_HTML_LENGTH_2048 0, FREEMAIL_TO 0, ARC_NA 0, TO_DN_SOME 0, MIME_TRACE 0, __NOT_SPOOFED 0
Message-ID-Hash: H6ZCNW2B4TFJPVKZ5UWXI4I76PZXHRSO
X-Message-ID-Hash: H6ZCNW2B4TFJPVKZ5UWXI4I76PZXHRSO
X-MailFrom: resnick@episteme.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mailmaint@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wrong-recipient-01
List-Id: Mail Maintenance <mailmaint.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mailmaint/4sA_SwBHYV6uXk8HYtTI806Fth8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mailmaint>
List-Help: <mailto:mailmaint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mailmaint-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mailmaint@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mailmaint-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mailmaint-leave@ietf.org>
I know, long past WGLC. I'm slow. Not a hill I will die on, but to me none of the 2119 words in the document are at all useful. The ones in section 6.3 seem especially silly. I think all of this could be rewritten without them. Windmill tilted at, pr -- Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ All connections to the world are tenuous at best On 6 Feb 2025, at 17:18, Ken Murchison wrote: > Dear WG Participants, > > This email starts a 2 week WG Last Call on the "Adding a Wrong > Recipient URL for Handling Misdirected Emails" document > (draft-ietf-mailmaint-wrong-recipient > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mailmaint-wrong-recipient/> > ) > > Please review this document and reply on the mailing list if you > support progression of the document to IESG or have any comments or > concerns, by the end of February 21, 2025. > > Note that per our charter that we will need at least one client and > server implementation before this will actually go to the IESG, but > given that this is just another flavor of 1-click unsubscribe, I don't > believe that this will be a show-stopper. > > Regards, > Ken > > -- > Kenneth Murchison > Senior Software Developer > Fastmail US LLC > IETF MailMaint Chair
- [mailmaint] WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wrong-re… Ken Murchison
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… John Levine
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… Ken Murchison
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… John Levine
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… Ken Murchison
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… John Levine
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… Pete Resnick
- [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-wron… John R. Levine