IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-objectid-partial-00

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Mon, 20 October 2025 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEC778EE93B for <mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ARICDaa-vEfD for <mailmaint@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [144.76.73.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09D078EE06D for <mailmaint@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gulbrandsen.priv.no
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1760997491; bh=F4b+fOAgWIgzLNoEXVjTuzex5ZRgDUl3KIQ88/8c7PI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ddl3i+dXj8Qb89xdP8sIUwUfoow/5RH6qdT08tUGysJ7/CurpUtAYOfUvP9P1+Wxe 18UXGipTBzEvs2jp38aoqCckfmDjogCptHyKUgdwjxqfl4Q3kZh0PyyVSTyBwev+Hq sISewV19XdBfkgKpbatvwICH2pCpfcpMsYUg/z8Y=
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC2CC0071; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:58:11 +0100 (IST)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1760997490-17206-17201/10/25622; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:58:10 +0000
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:58:10 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: mailmaint@ietf.org, Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <40776e12-f636-4b0e-8af2-cbf070150edb@fastmail.com>
References: <b4403ff0-204a-435d-ba62-7ed3ddac4f22@fastmail.com> <40776e12-f636-4b0e-8af2-cbf070150edb@fastmail.com>
Message-Id: <0DB746B6-74F9-418A-9648-B22DB233AFD6@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----OM45U5WDO4VQL3W3WMG311QS2VTWLC"
Message-ID-Hash: RRTWHKV3PD7PO27DEFE4ZOYNFWJCLGGE
X-Message-ID-Hash: RRTWHKV3PD7PO27DEFE4ZOYNFWJCLGGE
X-MailFrom: arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [mailmaint] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-objectid-partial-00
List-Id: Mail Maintenance <mailmaint.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mailmaint/SJ_7aQUk2Ci3CsqV4tdRdFHBfCE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mailmaint>
List-Help: <mailto:mailmaint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mailmaint-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mailmaint@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mailmaint-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mailmaint-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, 

in Madrid I said something positive, but very very close to zero. That remains my opinion. 

Should be simple though. Not worth excitement, and I say this as someone who's readily excited by pedantry.


On 20 October 2025 19:19:06 GMT+02:00, Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> wrote:
>All,
>
>There have been no comments on this draft.  Does this mean that nobody has read it, nobody cares, or there are no issues with it?
>
>
>On 10/6/25 10:03 AM, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> 
>> Dear WG Participants,
>> 
>> This email starts a WG Last Call on the "IMAP OBJECTID Partial" document (draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-objectid-partial) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mailmaint-imap-objectid-partial/>.
>> 
>> This is a very simple document that allows a server to implement just half of the existing OBJECTID capability.
>> 
>> Please review this document and reply on the mailing list if you support progression of the document to IESG or have any comments or concerns, by Fri, Oct 24, 2025.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Kenneth Murchison
>> Staff Software Developer
>> Fastmail US LLC
>> IETF MailMaint Co-Chair
>
>-- 
>Kenneth Murchison
>Staff Software Developer
>Fastmail US LLC
>IETF MailMaint Co-Chair

Arnt

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status