IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Manet-dt] NHDP - solicit?

"Krishna Sankar \(ksankar\)" <ksankar@cisco.com> Sat, 24 February 2007 00:38 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKkw7-0007C6-5i; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:38:51 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKkw6-0007C1-2V for manet-dt@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:38:50 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKkw3-0006fL-JV for manet-dt@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:38:50 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-6.cisco.com ([171.68.10.81]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2007 16:38:46 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,213,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="115762545:sNHT1018754838"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-6.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1O0ckYu012417; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:38:46 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l1O0cjho023838; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.188]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:38:45 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Manet-dt] NHDP - solicit?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:38:44 -0800
Message-ID: <9FA16888AD1BF64ABCE6C2532CCEB98A01B72431@xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <374005f30702231618w4a4acde8r2702bdf9b110c3fa@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Manet-dt] NHDP - solicit?
Thread-Index: AcdXqV0LMIwtyST/Rxa0egAHRd1p7gAAeDbg
From: "Krishna Sankar (ksankar)" <ksankar@cisco.com>
To: Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>, manet-dt@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2007 00:38:45.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[24443630:01C757AC]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1232; t=1172277526; x=1173141526; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim6002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ksankar@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Krishna=20Sankar=20\(ksankar\)=22=20<ksankar@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Manet-dt]=20NHDP=20-=20solicit? |Sender:=20; bh=kP/eS4CzN7LhMTINErBkO4xuDzM3ya1BskeOjk/d0kw=; b=RywPQ3YW0S8A4vGIOFXNeBAOzhUvFqOY/Q2K5B3r4150c9glQ2Ux01fulmu5Vn74JwwGiVUh BMUHOyAz7e2xStsR1uxUf86Wx3bSaRUQnxk4FsPQh3bD/bbdJ5annJSx;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-6; header.From=ksankar@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim6002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc:
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org

This is a good idea - especially when a node moves into a new
neighborhood. It need not wait for the welcome wagon (in our case the
HELLO wagon ;o)) to know who lives there.

Couple of caveats:

A)	If we go this route, we need to clearly articulate when to do
it, why and under what circumstances
B)	We also need a quenching mechanism, else when a set of new nodes
appear they can flood the system with solicitations. 
C)	I assume we will restrict this to 1 hop and 2 hop symmetric
circles

My 0.02$

Cheers & have a nice weekend
<k/>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Chakeres [mailto:ian.chakeres@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 4:19 PM
> To: manet-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: [Manet-dt] NHDP - solicit?
> 
> I've been reading through some of the MANEMO messages and 
> there was mention that ND is more appropriate for certain 
> things as it has the ability to solicit messages from nearby 
> nodes. Do you think NHDP should include semantics for 
> soliciting responses from nearby NHDP nodes?
> 
> Ian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manet-dt mailing list
> Manet-dt@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt
> 

_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email