IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 15 December 2016 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48D81296C0; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:03:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQFHzqRdwVVi; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F7C1299E8; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:02:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDBCBE5F; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:02:55 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dia7I9jGJTC4; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:02:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.210] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C058BE5C; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:02:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1481814169; bh=3a9HtbU2jeYBRQhrwwZXbIOqj5PQpw24qLHAby9/p8g=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=RJC/PHPxIJEXlf09zx+J0m78m0RFX3p4PI4MSIyTNfXnfT8i3ST8PpyIBwrZEtHjI ILqX+nWWyR+GBZtr2ioZwOYZ2CY7eQHPbsieXH3PL1AibRkTwrzXKz0SBjjWN0nmvR 9m/+7pnrvr0HogbAdwPf3rvdPnCpOczCEAsI99Es=
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
References: <148156334986.22491.1152871712874859894.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALtoyonu77P8O2r4zHvD5kBF7+yFc8Fxqe0BoEzeM6BsdoMZZg@mail.gmail.com> <79D48CEB-2CFC-43A8-8D01-5C5CB1778966@fastmail.fm> <CAGnRvupMRvpFq7EVfR4+QX88PG8fMnX49bAZ0_L9tm1a6sYX8g@mail.gmail.com> <9B802ACF-84EF-4C47-92F8-122CA724C71A@fastmail.fm> <CAGnRvuqKEwSU0nnkufzetGGUVzPSFjNOF6wrW=CRqc=t0x4dsQ@mail.gmail.com> <1481813917.419436.820073297.68E45D5D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <4f81336b-b9be-2891-f502-90cae6955e56@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:02:49 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1481813917.419436.820073297.68E45D5D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms050307050204020002050806"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/9ytZ67IriJknbOL1LCH-Sz0Hf9k>
Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org, manet-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:03:28 -0000


On 15/12/16 14:58, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> That is the question really. If the date is exposed outside of LAN, does
> it contain no sensitive information?
> 

If someone can tell a router that AA.BB/16 is connected "here"
then that'd I guess cause the router to send packets to that
interface that'd otherwise go out the default. Seems like that
could be the basis for some attacks, wouldn't it?

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email