[manet] draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-08 WGLC finished

Jiazi YI <ietf@jiaziyi.com> Mon, 30 May 2016 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <yi.jiazi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A93C12D666 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2qCqZLW1dgSm for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE55D12D667 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b73so55916921lfb.3 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=BDNWPuvC9lH1Lmhz3wRV24k/LW7t+My3np3O7Z5N5j0=; b=VcNDuoO3R+S+bH87tZGsCLehJbrMlL9YrSlRvSqUkvqxuF9PNgf8AMlyh1bQm3A50d aqEV1ckBeeNsLYeb17d3HnQeGJKu9874UC4WFpP1aR8jPsiuX/V2ZIl9PNEYWXu9Cf1B v7WJsEULRjUz4jF4wyVIoZbACDsAE/srfag5oDwpY7Q5/gq9Qy6UE9p7Bu/CIb4kj0hV nUq3nd3X5wBjgGNDAwpjRI/YSvmuU22LDC4U+L87RPxn35Na66RvlvkV7ftCTPBNUpe3 ftLZGtZLLa2SXzVnGt6Qn6//x2k/CqurkvzTk4INRdLgY1Tm0bxuH5I8lugYlaa3mxfV oTbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to; bh=BDNWPuvC9lH1Lmhz3wRV24k/LW7t+My3np3O7Z5N5j0=; b=RvETyiooHRg1pYptTm/k2vmx+p52HW3nE71JknaOOUcEu4eDUOHCtIaY6t/FHiKzlo AgduG7/KyyHA9cjVAOw2MssaFt3GYfdGu+MfafXrDqqNZyigG2HNJErO+37Oav5g7UTg E/5kHf94UlI/kMo2wA6ixsXHdYx7zCy4nFvMtlBFXo69fDSzvoewWn0EH5RpFeWCLv1m +QF9Y5lf9/VAO/GqXP9zpc1Itpp7qMLN3GTti2GHxK+SWjUQJ0I16v/I/W33xJcYEqW5 98gvAFXg3qP57Xbdh/oCC345oZbkf97jCWAwdlSow2t71HaewXBDr0xSJjdtP6OJcmCN WQ6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL9KsDQiiRVgG5WmM3G051VNB0MnOvyROdCWFZMm2luUEIflJfZX3IYURacd2KgxPECd+LF0i+tri3OTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.150.195 with SMTP id y186mr8134323lfd.169.1464643526936; Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: yi.jiazi@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.77.4 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:25:26 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qDnxcOz2BWctYymlNRpUzBTIyYY
Message-ID: <CAN1bDFyrVHy_KyJz25G7Now2Re7rLWwH9d=domDMtL+qZP5X8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jiazi YI <ietf@jiaziyi.com>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11402104255359053415e5b9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/AnZy33ydB6F-P7Q1nKsKRBL9xFI>
Subject: [manet] draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-08 WGLC finished
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 21:25:35 -0000

Hi all,

The WGLC of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-08 has finished. We got
valuable comments from Chris -- thanks very much!

Based on the comments received, a new revision will be submitted soon with
following updates:

   - Make the style more consistent with other OLSRv2-RFC suite.

   - Make the reactive multipath calculation optional. Both proactive and
reactive calculation can be used. Such modification won't impact
interoperability.

   - Clarify the use of SR_TC_INTERVAL.

   - Clarify the generation/update of Multi-path routing Set (this is
related to reactive/proactive calculation also)

   - Clarify the use of fp and fe in the multipath Dijkstra algorithm

   - Chris raised the concern about impact partial topology map on
multipath calculation. As indicated in
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg19038.html , with
non-trival amount of studies performed, no issue related to this has been
reported yet. As it's related to the MPR-selection algorithm used, we can
put it as one of the experimental points to make people pay attention to
it, so that new issues can be reported.

regards

Jiazi