[manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6877)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 10 March 2022 11:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347E73A0938 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 03:18:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZQwEieH3ZMP for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 03:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEFEB3A0902 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 03:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 859CF1E652; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 03:18:49 -0800 (PST)
To: sratliff@idirect.net, sjury@cisco.com, dsatterw@broadcom.com, rick.taylor@airbus.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, dfedyk@labn.net, ronald.intvelt@tno.nl
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: izar.cz@gmail.com, manet@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220310111849.859CF1E652@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 03:18:49 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/FL4hoUM7UtnuaGCQuu8XCOaRihY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 03:27:34 -0800
Subject: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6877)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:18:54 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8175, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6877 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Izar <izar.cz@gmail.com> Section: 12.2. Original Text ------------- All status code values less than 100 have a failure mode of 'Continue'; all other status codes have a failure mode of 'Terminate'. Corrected Text -------------- All status code values less than 128 have a failure mode of 'Continue'; all other status codes have a failure mode of 'Terminate'. Notes ----- "Table 2: DLEP Status Codes" indicates that all status code values less than 128 have failure mode 'Continue'. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8175 (draft-ietf-manet-dlep-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Publication Date : June 2017 Author(s) : S. Ratliff, S. Jury, D. Satterwhite, R. Taylor, B. Berry Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8175 (6877) RFC Errata System