[manet] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)

"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 19:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160601191400.16077.83083.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:14:00 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/J9GbztVrI9fQvhA-QE09YSUOZW0>
Cc: manet@ietf.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis@ietf.org, manet-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [manet] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll wait for the response to Stephen's question as I also noticed the
boilerplate wasn't used (SecDir review did too, kinda).

I do appreciate the descriptions provided for the threats associated with
the read/write read/create objects.  Thanks for that.

[manet] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft… Kathleen Moriarty
Re: [manet] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… Ulrich Herberg
Re: [manet] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… kathleen.moriarty.ietf