Re: [manet] manet Digest, Vol 171, Issue 9

christine Ssemwogerere <ssemwotinex@yahoo.co.uk> Wed, 22 August 2018 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ssemwotinex@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A685130DF5 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_MIME_MALF=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAE6Tm2AXnRv for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic307-54.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic307-54.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [87.248.110.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098281294D0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1534932012; bh=ecGtc8jnCxs5fXM4TMmqeOdEGKO2EOrGFlP6j5D+9gY=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=Qe9VKH4WNjm1hgVsJXaedE3iuF6soETNJDm1SMZrZPVQscB9pOm3Bga5ambyIwUMVYeWvC3krMJddJMmVXsDdrTeEtdt04qFVxSYTqJ0l//m+inbeIJOQcCUsa4ogMKXHMTpGC9z2rFPe3sl1sMw9bOEqEsXopQ7TXOEREumG7MwAlZXR4cSdhGXsCCHSh2TQIV5DFbN9ExKXxm/83AeGOp3lgTmDE3tqH68QQtZxEho9AwUquwTlk349j4WutbmtsoOseihpY4N7xyb237qzHJdVEF2haowMqpAz3Q0542qlkagAjOOWqCHI/risVBFMPUhayR+khHMvNuHmAHinw==
X-YMail-OSG: J0tQp54VM1lL9JjPQihFRaC3RPlq75w5w_eZhdBKduzZtymJuk7kj9hZUIScGLU Ya5OVPX7lB9SyTUXk57xZwvCN1NCBl9phsAfFdpo1NumZmz98zauphu36XawFGbmCLXnjJaN.eEz f8ETNww7koChKO9gKuo72O_0Ty.tTWrelQ.nWWcfmnUye.awsfKWRPlTCurROXJqZPAuvKHnhOoc z431zWVGw9cglBVvmCKtiSmE2VnfdnZ1ajhbbzUe8.lnupqtuTCuhMUE8hjXavoywDRnYyJImFlk eASQHqRoV6Znht3fZa133ACIitdu4EzFVfsEJr9dcMOJLqbQKPTtgGoNFK_b2l4qLRzdm13O6q7H 4GJMs2w4ExABe0Oh64T1ceh4RyUNm.2d_Z8qfM3VWKHnZN05xuTVcbZY9J_Dff50a5manzNpNr2b u5sxtOCwdRxBWPb0Q5g9xeLH7Ch3Z0dFeFlzWKMBreldKU55nxWzzu9xY6IokRiUXzcdnGA_GdzE LguzTF1pE_YSIw0Gcn1U3uDT.oWSlxI.ygW5OtC5Rf_bV2dh5sf78J_kWkr2IA9dZ.bT1AGtR81H d_VlgMAn33VI2MN51mpT_Chv7RcI.18WKQ1cqC1mj7oQr_E_SloYifFZRXcc8S7Iu_BQaYjS4lVV N5IrN.5wInGXVWAN0R_ZyjZHjaXG.avOy9kibvUY47z5o5zhVj2cCfNfftIQeFFfyiqYig7bQvVB t4Td5cSXBeHJsiJ9it6cBFABFOfSe3UDmfJa345xQOtyTqlvvoaeCws3bAL3GV2fE0QwHdWQ4Jxs zqEPywHbCuqbSjSpvQjcRMDK3w9q9.DwVCvfJwTVblXYN4qBYC4nUGSvFvav2NZlAQ1fiZ86SOZf 9BU3qFT2M6YIt60rcrY2aQQxi_T8u.X0K89YRr8.Kx1BOw9v6SoFcy_2Urc6hSgCbrAZbcVW0VUR YONqR77EqRqfDC_euuznL8pfKribQkQ--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:00:12 +0000
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: christine Ssemwogerere <ssemwotinex@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <manet@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1230052994.1130762.1534932011872@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.81.1534791619.12262.manet@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.81.1534791619.12262.manet@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1130761_18410058.1534932011864"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.12262 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.87 Safari/537.36 OPR/54.0.2952.71
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/M3CFmT9a-1NIVgvgPtIUGR77D-8>
Subject: Re: [manet] manet Digest, Vol 171, Issue 9
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:00:17 -0000

 i am carrying ut my research about the blackhole attack on MANETs, but have failed to download NS2, advise me please, thanks
    On Monday, 20 August 2018, 22:01:36 GMT+3, manet-request@ietf.org <manet-request@ietf.org> wrote:  
 
 Send manet mailing list submissions to
    manet@ietf.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    manet-request@ietf.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    manet-owner@ietf.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of manet digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: DLEP LID extension (Rick Taylor)
  2. I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03.txt
      (internet-drafts@ietf.org)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:15:20 +0000
From: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
To: "ujenreznik@gmail.com" <ujenreznik@gmail.com>om>, "manet@ietf.org"
    <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] DLEP LID extension
Message-ID:
    <0393dac10b26ee57d8279fe057697350f8ad3d07.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Sat, 2018-08-18 at 13:56 +0300, Eugene Reznik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to make sure that I correctly understand the draft-ietf-
> manet-dlep-lid-extension-02 .
> 
> The draft says in paragraph 3.1. that the default length of the link
> identifier data item is 4.
> However, in paragraph 3.2. it says that the default length of the
> link identifier data item is 5.
> The value of 5 made sense in previous drafts in presence of the Flags
> field. The Flags field length was 1 octet, which led to the overall
> length of 5 (4 octets of the link identifier plus 1 octet of the
> Flags field).
> In this draft there is no mention of the Flags field.

Hi Eugene,

This looks like a typo.  The field length should be 4, not 5.  There
once was a Flags field, but as it had no obvious use, so it was
removed.  Obviously that part of the text wasn't updated to reflect the
change - I'll update in my working copy and it will be in any further
releases!

Thanks,

Rick

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:28:14 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: [manet] I-D Action:
    draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03.txt
Message-ID: <153477889434.23151.12320035839273935590@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks WG of the IETF.

        Title          : DLEP Link Identifier Extension
        Authors        : Rick Taylor
                          Stan Ratliff
    Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03.txt
    Pages          : 7
    Date            : 2018-08-20

Abstract:
  There exists a class of modems that wish to support the Dynamic Link
  Exchange Protocol (DLEP) [RFC8175] but do not present a single Layer
  2 network domain as required by DLEP.  Such devices may be:

  o  Modems that maintain a varying link to some upstream backbone
      network infrastructure, where the ability to announce link state
      and DLEP metrics is desired, but the concept of a DLEP destination
      router for the backbone does not apply.  Examples of such devices
      can include LTE modems, IEEE 802.11 stations not in ad-hoc mode,
      and some satellite terminals.

  o  Modems that provide Layer 3 wide area network connectivity between
      devices, where individual DLEP destinations do exist, but are not
      directly reachable by MAC address.

  This document introduces an optional extension to the core DLEP
  specification, allowing DLEP to be used between routers and modems
  that operate in this way.

  Note:

  o  This document is intended as an extension to the core DLEP
      specification, and readers are expected to be fully conversant
      with the operation of core DLEP.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet


------------------------------

End of manet Digest, Vol 171, Issue 9
*************************************