[manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3561 (7762)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 14 January 2024 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFBDC14F6A1 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 706nRPUR-6yq for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E1D3C14F682 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 32E663E8A7; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:56:16 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: me@byheiko.de, Charles.Perkins@nokia.com, ebelding@cs.ucsb.edu, sdas@ececs.uc.edu, manet@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240114145617.32E663E8A7@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:56:16 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/MyUNyGNq9Opseqxjk-si1hAkaiE>
Subject: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3561 (7762)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 14:56:21 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3561, "Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7762 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Heiko Kiesel <me@byheiko.de> Section: 6.7. Original Text ------------- (iii) the sequence numbers are the same, but the route is is marked as inactive, or Corrected Text -------------- (iii) the sequence numbers are the same, but the route is marked as inactive, or Notes ----- Grammar mistake: Duplicated "is" Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3561 (draft-ietf-manet-aodv-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing Publication Date : July 2003 Author(s) : C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3561 (7762) RFC Errata System