Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01.txt
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 08 November 2017 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1BD126C23 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:28:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2iIWFkISeM1s for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D610126C22 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CMOut01 (unknown [10.0.90.82]) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C51E2F5F for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:16:51 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id XRGn1w0072SSUrH01RGqMA; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:16:51 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=K4VSJ2eI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=sC3jslCIGhcA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=VRRTJ5-aRumYiWxeoY8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FCKqRA5IY3vWJmfZ9tVx6wjbuRFXpqBXm7YGjvCQkTc=; b=SkF3Qu89rJz8WjL0rglwGio2IU Tjef+OVu0Fl/ZVoUkWSulAS2QyhxQf0kxEbBHyWmTUn/eYOT9c++kCE9v+eJYPgrnIm3cQWp6XHdx 8VaPtYVRiCjnLAJi6d9k2DuiA;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:42760 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1eCQDm-000cY5-VP; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:16:47 -0700
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
References: <150938684459.7924.12734346764675720800@ietfa.amsl.com> <73f0c278-746d-89ad-1f22-fa409a1ad085@labn.net> <CAGnRvurZ4DTHsjFo2TVcarCd2s_zw0WKe7s+1RqyPwU7-gAzsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <91e583fe-3a1e-ac69-721c-0bd6a7fbc4cb@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:16:42 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvurZ4DTHsjFo2TVcarCd2s_zw0WKe7s+1RqyPwU7-gAzsw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1eCQDm-000cY5-VP
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:42760
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Od2PgZVfL8Yfux31vPjZaOHK0fI>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:28:04 -0000
Henning, Thank you for the comments - please see below for in-line responses. On 11/8/2017 2:15 AM, Henning Rogge wrote: > two nitpicks for Chapter 3: > > the second sentence of the first paragraph should read > > The Latency Range Item MAY be carried in the same > messages and MUST be processed according to the same rules as the > Latency Data Item defined in [RFC8175]. > > There is no "Latency Range Data Item" in RFC8175. Yes, cut-and-paste bug -- good catch! > Second, maybe moving to nanoseconds is a good idea? The range is still > "longer than humans used radio", but we already have radios with > sub-microsecond timings I think. I have no objections -- what do others think? Lou > Henning Rogge > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This version included updated references and some minor editorial fixes. >> >> Lou (for authors) >> >> >> On 10/30/2017 2:07 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : DLEP Lantency Range Extension >>> Authors : Bow-Nan Cheng >>> Lou Berger >>> Filename : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01.txt >>> Pages : 5 >>> Date : 2017-10-30 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document defines an extension to the DLEP protocol to provide >>> the range of latency that may be experienced on a link. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01 >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> manet mailing list >>> manet@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list >> manet@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
- [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency… internet-drafts
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lat… Ratliff, Stanley