[manet] AD Review of draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 29 May 2015 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD461A8A9E; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ouG95PSB3Myc; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935711B2DB3; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1479; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432935738; x=1434145338; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=fAF+VGMCyCHGFJhFKK3qsjT2kho/zsWFWzS3m6pF/EU=; b=Onn8mtoKsZPIsLVmsWC+rB0d+YhOTwgopj+VqITZ3XFOV8cTBwZ/EPVn FtH29TrOs1e05A1thwnRMKuDmFVqkj+yJ31+K+Q2098Ao+4m4oFTJftKu HNZbd4pBkIHybTfUTPvm+HDj0VWVotqYUILPVVx5a/6NPnH/YHQS4uwX8 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AIBQCI3GhV/49dJa1cgkVLgTjFfoFLTAEBAQEBAYELhBkMBHkSAQsBdCcEDogy1SEBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBGpBJhDQFkE6CPIsSgSmDcZIYI4N4gjWBAQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,519,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="423742907"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2015 21:42:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4TLgHSx013726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 29 May 2015 21:42:17 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.46]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:42:17 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis
Thread-Index: AQHQmlhUJcbxBZdnVk+WktuAudwUvw==
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:42:16 +0000
Message-ID: <D18E5567.B451F%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D18E5567B451Faretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Or_e04uTd1UmNjlb2cKoOnVQmgI>
Cc: "chris.dearlove@baesystems.com" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, "manet-chairs@ietf.org" <manet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [manet] AD Review of draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:42:20 -0000

Hi!

I just finished looking at this document.  Given that the changes wrt RFC6779 are minimum, I think it is ready to proceed.

Before we move forward to an IETF Last Call, we need to get a MIB Doctor’s review, which I have requested separately.  Please be on the lookout for any comments.

Thanks!

Alvaro.