[manet] Do MANET-To - Centralized Hybrids make sense?
"Christopher P. Rigano" <cpr@nc.rr.com> Thu, 28 October 2004 03:06 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA11331 for <manet-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN0qg-0005v4-M2 for manet-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:21:14 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CN0Zm-000352-S1; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:46 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CN0Zd-0002zZ-Ei for manet@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA11208 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.100] helo=ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN0nb-0005rX-MZ for manet@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:18:04 -0400
Received: from CPQ73745201364 (rdu168-179-206.nc.rr.com [24.168.179.206]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i9S33TKj010178 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Christopher P. Rigano" <cpr@nc.rr.com>
To: manet@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:03:27 -0400
Message-ID: <000001c4bc9a$b2889ee0$0600a8c0@CPQ73745201364>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8c5db863102a3ada84e0cd52a81a79e
Subject: [manet] Do MANET-To - Centralized Hybrids make sense?
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1388673274=="
Sender: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 140baa79ca42e6b0e2b4504291346186
Greetings Does it make sense for a MANET to switch to a Base-Station Architecture and visa-versa dynamically to fit certain situations? What might those situations be? Thanks and regards, Christopher
_______________________________________________ manet mailing list manet@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
- [manet] Do MANET-To - Centralized Hybrids make se… Christopher P. Rigano
- RE: [manet] Do MANET-To - Centralized Hybrids mak… Giorgio Mulas