[manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5148 (1735)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 23 March 2009 02:49 UTC
Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: manet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61A83A68ED for <manet@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.377, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0klKVo3me51 for <manet@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4653A67AA for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2N2nWDk016491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n2N2nT8D016473; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:49:29 -0700
Message-Id: <200903230249.n2N2nT8D016473@boreas.isi.edu>
To: T.Clausen@computer.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil, rcallon@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, macker@itd.nrl.navy.mil, ian.chakeres@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:52:13 -0700
Cc: manet@ietf.org, T.Clausen@computer.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5148 (1735)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:49:20 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5148, "Jitter Considerations in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5148&eid=1735 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Thomas Clausen <T.Clausen@Computer.org> Section: 7.2 Original Text ------------- [7] Clausen, T., Dearlove, C., Dean, J., and C. Adjih, "Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format", Work in Progress. Corrected Text -------------- [7] Clausen, T., Dearlove, C., Dean, J., and C. Adjih, "Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format", RFC 5444, February 2009. Notes ----- draft-ietf-manet-packetbb ("Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format") was published as RFC5444. RFC5148 should, therefore, reference this archival document (RFC5444) rather than the Internet Draft. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5148 (draft-ietf-manet-jitter-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Jitter Considerations in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Publication Date : February 2008 Author(s) : T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, B. Adamson Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5148 (1735) RFC Errata System