Re: [manet] What happened to ZRP ?

"Pete Sholander" <psholand@scires.com> Tue, 03 February 2004 16:16 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA16209 for <manet-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:16:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3D8-0004P3-4i for manet-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:15:38 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i13GFc1x016921 for manet-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:15:38 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3D8-0004Oq-0v for manet-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:15:38 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA16195 for <manet-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:15:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3D7-0003OE-00 for manet-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:15:37 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3CF-0003Hf-00 for manet-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:14:43 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3Bg-0003Ax-00 for manet-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:14:08 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3BZ-00041C-AC; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:14:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao3B8-0003yS-FZ for manet@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:13:34 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA16088 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:13:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3B7-00038E-00 for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:13:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao3AG-00031X-00 for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:12:41 -0500
Received: from 66-152-29-4.ded.btitelecom.net ([66.152.29.4] helo=mail.scires.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao39Q-0002nG-00 for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:11:49 -0500
Received: from SRCATL-MTA by mail.scires.com with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:09:22 -0500
Message-Id: <s01f8162.080@mail.scires.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.3
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:08:48 -0500
From: Pete Sholander <psholand@scires.com>
To: haas@ece.cornell.edu, manet@n0rg.org
Cc: manet@ietf.org, adhoc@n0rg.org
Subject: Re: [manet] What happened to ZRP ?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: manet-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: manet-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Laurent,

A ZRP variant has been used for open-air field-tests (10 - 25 node) every few months since last March.  The implementation is similar to, but not identical to, the ZRP drafts.  We also have a version that uses OLSR as its proactive component, that we use in our lab.

I offered to update the ZRP drafts into an RFC document last March -- but was told not to bother by Macker and Corson.  So, Zygmunt's still submitting items to the IRTF -- but I've dropped the issue for a while.  If ANS expresses serious interest in "hybrid" protocols -- and especially ones that allow designers to incorporate their favorite proactive/reactive components (e.g., OLSR and AODV) into a hybrid framework -- then I'll contribute to I-Ds based on my group's field experience.

--Pete Sholander
Scientific Research Corporation		
Atlanta, GA		

E: psholander@scires.com
V: 770-989-9551

>>> "haas@ece.cornell.edu" <haas@ece.cornell.edu> 02/03/04 05:55AM >>>
Hi Laurent,

> I was looking for an implementation of ZRP when i realized that the last
> draft of ZPR draft-ietf-manet-zone-zrp-04.txt has expired in january
> 2003 and was no more available on the IETF web.

We will be updating the ZRP draft in the near future with some implementation 
experience that we have gathered recently. 

In particular, we want to emphasize the *scalability* aspect of ZRP. Thus,
we expect to submit the revised draft to the IRTF ANS group
(http://www.flarion.com/ans-research/).

If you need the old drafts, those are still available on our web page at: 
	http://wnl.ece.cornell.edu/wnlother.html 

Zygmunt.
==-=-=====
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Prof. Zygmunt J. Haas                    http://people.ece.cornell.edu/haas 
Wireless Networks Laboratory		 http://wnl.ece.cornell.edu 
School of Electrical Engineering         
Cornell University			 tel: +1-607-255-3454
323 Frank Rhodes Hall			 fax: +1-607-255-9072
Ithaca, NY 14853			 e-mail: haas@ece.cornell.edu 
U.S.A                             
	WNL web page: http://wnl.ece.cornell.edu 
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Laurent Dehoey wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I was looking for an implementation of ZRP when i realized that the last
> draft of ZPR draft-ietf-manet-zone-zrp-04.txt has expired in january
> 2003 and was no more available on the IETF web.
> 
> Since there is no RFC published for it, and there is not much discussion
> about it in the MANET mailing list, does it mean that we can "forget" it ?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Laurent Dehoey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org 
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet 


_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet


_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet