IETF Logo Mail Archive

[manet] draft-sratliff-dlep-00

Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com> Wed, 04 August 2010 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2D13A6918 for <manet@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SpTexrp7Syzp for <manet@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6AA3A67E6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHZAWUxAZnwN/2dsb2JhbACgGXGqPptPhTsEiSI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,316,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="143311626"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2010 17:28:00 +0000
Received: from dhcp-64-102-54-112.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-54-112.cisco.com [64.102.54.112]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o74HS09I021758 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:28:00 GMT
Message-Id: <4F60AEF7-6E5B-4418-B73D-68EDFD0C9BEF@cisco.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0349584B@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:28:00 -0400
References: <AANLkTim2KguoikQd3Uc+T375JoCm80bHvQdxO35zqXGP@mail.gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0349584B@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Subject: [manet] draft-sratliff-dlep-00
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:27:35 -0000

Was submitted on Aug 2 and is on the ietf site at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sratliff-dlep/

One difference from what was presented in Maastricht:  Authentication  
has been removed from the draft. There was an off-list discussion  
about handling authentication within the context of the packetbb-sec  
draft; that seems like a better approach than handling it inside of  
DLEP.

Regards,
Stan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email