Re: [manet] Routing MPR Optimization for OLSRv2 review
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 02 January 2014 20:25 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A01ADF91 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:25:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B42LCcBqEyUL for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A1C1ADF59 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id lj1so14981677pab.15 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:25:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=L3UEwpoPcrT/qmAWcSErxBYvN/M4EcBXoEelG+yzdDE=; b=uB+vKEeyA3ZuowRL5xybolywQhpBinVoizObcfwWM+vqt5qP4VXt1GHnnhVMI6jh3I isVqEvEgWwce8RDDCRNBdYSN+2VpYJ6srhydm5coimMN5bttwYSwuFTH21ydBhbEaZKn NkfjFGbgSRPxGKRbTE8pJCVc8IY3UYyNwJmvwUli2HjvbVlAJPrBlckhqGOgXKDQw5Hk 1i6pH1LftapjwT0VWMeV71K2rEL6CYOBoj72m0Qir3YbOzCgkSH9T3QYdnUl4kKA+uue GiYovrMsWXMNoZpivRrJxN/5AGhgYDKpeT0P2UFtFXGWCc90iuWGHbBfxwn7PQvSUIqD ItEg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.154.75 with SMTP id vm11mr91526074pab.124.1388694303287; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.0.104 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:25:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D401D4F6C@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
References: <CA+-pDCdU4DLz8_8YAfVJo3_u+=PCp75F=AD6XjgtV=F6aBc7GQ@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D401D4F6C@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:25:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_T6o5UWspZCD06kLLGAH7prevZdq1RBSt6q4iDGk49kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [manet] Routing MPR Optimization for OLSRv2 review
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 20:25:12 -0000
This WG document -00 had never changed after adoption. The first reviewer on 11 Nov comments was not influence for new update, and the second reviewer as well, in addition no much discussion on the work, I propose to consider the comments received in MANET WG before next IETF call, On 1/2/14, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com> wrote: > One point I think we should stress more heavily is that we do not repeat the > rationale for the exclusions, that's already in the referenced metrics ID > (RFC 6966-to-be). Familiarity with the relevant section of the ID is > assumed. the reference name is not correct in the draft, it was pointed by the first review and still not amended. AB
- [manet] Routing MPR Optimization for OLSRv2 review Justin Dean
- Re: [manet] Routing MPR Optimization for OLSRv2 r… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] Routing MPR Optimization for OLSRv2 r… Abdussalam Baryun