Re: [manet] LOADng works
Jon Black <jblack.ietf@yahoo.com> Fri, 02 November 2012 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jblack.ietf@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1D911E80E5 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.035
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.563, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njHEwtp1fG1h for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm32-vm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm32-vm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DD111E80DE for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.212.153] by nm32.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Nov 2012 21:23:22 -0000
Received: from [98.139.215.250] by tm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Nov 2012 21:23:22 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1063.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Nov 2012 21:23:22 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 366302.20795.bm@omp1063.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 80153 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Nov 2012 21:23:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1351891402; bh=lK3ZU4OA1shdWmNLMkwBtrQlpZwlf62sTQD8tsBBtco=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ujmA6jTKSR7fzdDDXw+gj3dDQCOOeHWmCI+EvLOLw7i1pXDrztOtyIoicPqXK59Pqkd8Wxl0/rOclVDyvXtpsdHmMVL6TmXW6cjjXv8mbGVPsC3ihVp/FsvTLzdFliVO4Jgdq/ikzupDJtesPBrpzx9XerQnXneI9nwwu0Nsqu0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4LXpVvmpHgPoW/CHU7HeGNsvx/jd4VbE2HuYoN92qsGuiniKV0J3n6ypulY1wHuvWyGDolF7S7xMRPh4thwf6K3rzzsMFEiWGvIIT6AsjtZZqcteE5sBn0BUvh7VpZCfpaEfWt5y3LZtfnbj/TP6ay383zn/ZBq18f3qhISw2f4=;
X-YMail-OSG: Olj2POYVM1l6kOuiwOoymkM_rEOX8rJtoxgriE7ijWwVdf9 Bgc7GkmUr5BFUNM57pMuVE8J1bMJnaqxxfnktrtHlgbElXV50mCA84DLTi2B QK5mk1DNe72thDhY92B8hyKlyylA3zoisKWwTTGfEcMY_Z8B1._ON_TRL6TR .MKOVsfOsupUld8vNHc1lmF4LWQiZWHma41AHxPLgIh38XI9WkNpnV1mN1oQ BHRqTk8AkQ24N1xDCH2fY0LxwvNTqzHp4ZL8NSdHIC8WNqU14tyfKHQvWLeb ILY5pcZqOKoiG7PQbtZjVVVWmtSFdO2QIHHhox6GMORcq_iiZJxIF5vzNy3i PVZ9ZqmeTMwRj5sowaHEplKv6ps09WWgn015nePquoZMEaOUW1O2SNnENElS AYFO36D.oFtKN9Gnv72ucwAkicGu1CvfR95OpBnHA4c5a7BNx8kMQZovHN5c g8P81t5Oi_gNtk1xe8Xnwc..PBoyiPcsRDGjl64iL.9YcrX3zXXu2VLtUekr MXBZpLHaCwBAo2.ec7uJOjDGm8NtjnAVZyikQyTYhU0FHAShEApcY5A7Hufn jVd2GmLgskG.v1W1S70L7g1O9QxE2gc6N9swFyhso9.yAnAJuYVlN1RJ.LMh r
Received: from [173.193.202.116] by web160605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:23:22 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, c2VlIGxpbmUgW0pvbl0KCgoKCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCiBGcm9tOiBKUCBWYXNzZXVyIChqdmFzc2V1cikgPGp2YXNzZXVyQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4KCkhpIFVscmljaCwgCgoKT24gTm92IDIsIDIwMTIsIGF0IDE6MjIgUE0sIFVscmljaCBIZXJiZXJnIHdyb3RlOgoKSlAsCj4KPgo.T24gRnJpLCBOb3YgMiwgMjAxMiBhdCAxMDowOSBBTSwgSlAgVmFzc2V1ciAoanZhc3NldXIpIDxqdmFzc2V1ckBjaXNjby5jb20.IHdyb3RlOgo.Cj4KPj5PbiBOb3YgMiwgMjAxMiwgYXQgMTI6MDYBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.123.460
References: <1351706263.11550.YahooMailNeo@web160601.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A77220464DA@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <1351726777.19955.YahooMailNeo@web160602.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A77220486F0@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <1351783936.31212.YahooMailNeo@web160601.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7722049540@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <1351828308.94489.YahooMailNeo@web160601.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A772204AAED@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <5093EF93.70201@saloits.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A772204C49F@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <CAK=bVC8dtnAFkg3Q=pAbU0P0c4rOY0sDfDi9z3bKNj9sAKjV5A@mail.gmail.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A772204C845@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1351891402.40332.YahooMailNeo@web160605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:23:22 -0700
From: Jon Black <jblack.ietf@yahoo.com>
To: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com>, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
In-Reply-To: <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A772204C845@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1933122451-1380974158-1351891402=:40332"
Cc: "Timothy J. Salo" <salo@saloits.com>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] LOADng works
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jon Black <jblack.ietf@yahoo.com>
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:23:24 -0000
see line [Jon] ________________________________ From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) <jvasseur@cisco.com> Hi Ulrich, On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Ulrich Herberg wrote: JP, > > >On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:09 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) <jvasseur@cisco.com> wrote: > > >>On Nov 2, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Timothy J. Salo wrote: >> >>>>>> JP> This is not just a question of "how large" it is … but also how >>>>>> dynamic. I could show you few hundreds (if not less number of nodes) >>>>>> not working if the traffic pattern is too dynamic. This is a >>>>>> fundamental problem. >>> >>> No, it is a fundamental and well-known characteristic of reactive >>> routing protocols. It is a problem only when this behavior doesn't >>> match the characteristics of the network in which the reactive routing >>> protocol is deployed. >> >> JP> Indeed … and this is why you have a fundamental issue with you have extremely high BER, PDR, >>low bandwidth … as we do in LLNs. Flooding in these networks is driven by user traffic and of course >>is highly undesirable. Slightly increase the use traffic and you will see the impact on the control plane ... >> > > > > >Yes, but as Timothy mentioned, there are cases where you don't have much user traffic. JP> Then if you recognize that reactive routing is an issue when user traffic increases, this is a good start. When do you put the limit ? By the way, the topology is another argument, so does the bandwidth. Let me be even more specific: * Case 1: 75KBits/s, P2MP traffic (not referring to multicast), small broadcast domains, meter readout every 24h. Certainly you can deploy a reactive routing protocol ? Still I do not see why you would not use a pro-active routing but this is another question Now what if you move to case 2: * Unsolicited alarms using meters, DA, EV traffic for bill roaming ? Well you do not have a major problem and when designing protocol we need to take this into account. Please see RFC RFC 5548 (draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs) Routing Requirements for Urban Low-Power and Lossy Networks 2009-05 RFC 5548 (Informational) Adrian Farrel RFC 5673 (draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs) Industrial Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks 2009-10 RFC 5673 (Informational) Adrian Farrel RFC 5826 (draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs) Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks 2010-04 RFC 5826 (Informational) Errata Adrian Farrel RFC 5867 (draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs) Building Automation Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks 2010-06 RFC 5867 (Informational) [Jon] Which RFC? Do you mean RFC 5826 or 5867 both of which seem to need RPL P2P which looks like a new protocol? Do you mean RFC 5548 which seems to be the use case from EDF that is using a reactive protocol (LOADng), or RFC5673 which no one has tried. Just because something was designed to do something you can't claim that it actually will do it. The Titanic was designed to be unsinkable... But I digress, since you did. It does appear that your objection is the name ('cause it could confuse someone into think they could use this manet protocol in an LLN - which as you said was their choice) and that there is one small paragraph there it says that they might be able to use this protocol in their LLN. Really, this is what all the hub-bub is about. After all they really are both AODV++. So we find a new name and remove one paragraph. I think now the debate is what is the proper base from which to start. Which document is clearer, and more stable. Jon
- [manet] (no subject) reham elmayet
- [manet] (no subject) koppolu prasad
- [manet] (no subject) Michael Sessinghaus
- [manet] (no subject) Adam J Schuhmacher
- [manet] (no subject) Harry
- [manet] (no subject) hussam amin
- [manet] (no subject) Joe Macker
- [manet] (no subject) Peter Pham
- [manet] (no subject) Deepanshu Shukla
- [manet] (no subject) 3fad9ca8ab7fa48557
- [manet] (no subject) yang weihua
- [manet] directional antennae Vikram Kanodia
- Re: [manet] directional antennae Mineo Takai
- Re: [manet] directional antennae prashanth kumar
- Re: [manet] directional antennae Vikram Kanodia
- Re: [manet] directional antennae romit roychoudhury
- Re: [manet] directional antennae Vikram Kanodia
- Re: [manet] directional antennae Mineo Takai
- [manet] (no subject) ayman ghazi
- [manet] RE:routing metrics idc
- [manet] Zone Routing Protocol Girish Borkar
- Re: [manet] Zone Routing Protocol Liangping Ma
- [manet] (no subject) Peter Phuc Pham
- [manet] Manet Applications Harpreet S. Arora
- RE: [manet] Manet Applications Kaustubh Phanse
- Re: [manet] Manet Applications Jay J Lee
- RE: [manet] Manet Applications haas
- Re: [manet] Manet Applications Ankur Jain
- [manet] (no subject) reham elmayet
- [manet] (no subject) arunachalam srinivas
- Re: [manet] Manet Applications Ankur Jain
- Re: [manet] Manet Applications Sukanta Kumar Hazra
- [manet] (no subject) reham elmayet
- [manet] (no subject) Alvin Valera
- RE: [manet] Manet Applications Jeff Boleng
- [manet] (no subject) ghannay.sana@laposte.net
- [manet] (no subject) Zurkarmawan Abu Bakar
- [manet] (no subject) reham elmayet
- RE: [manet] (no subject) Andrew Thiessen
- [manet] IP address --unique ID George Hadjichristofi
- Re: [manet] IP address --unique ID Jaehoon Jeong
- [manet] (no subject) Karun Verma
- [manet] (no subject) reham elmayet
- [manet] (no subject) jm.orset
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Ash Mohammad Abbas
- Re: [manet] Ad Hoc IP Address Autoconfiguration Jaehoon Jeong
- [manet] (no subject) Ash Mohammad Abbas
- [manet] (no subject) spagoni@inwind.it
- [manet] (no subject) samir.chihi
- [manet] (no subject) arun kumar optical
- [manet] (no subject) hejue2980
- [manet] (no subject) darwin jb clement
- [manet] (no subject) darwin jb clement
- [manet] (no subject) sanjay prasad
- [manet] (no subject) gawlin
- [manet] (no subject) darwin jb clement
- [manet] (no subject) Kan Cai
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Tao Lin
- Re: [manet] (no subject) CDS vs. MPRs Richard Ogier
- Re: [manet] (no subject) CDS vs. MPRs Tao Lin
- Re: [manet] CDS vs. MPR vs. UBF Justin Lipman
- Re: [manet] (no subject) CDS vs. MPRs Kan Cai
- Re: [manet] (no subject) CDS vs. MPRs Richard Ogier
- [manet] (no subject) WXH
- [manet] (no subject) Nauman Aslam
- [manet] (no subject) debkanta chakraborty
- [manet] (no subject) srgopal
- [manet] (no subject) rv72
- [manet] (no subject) rv72
- [manet] (no subject) Peng Hu
- [manet] (no subject) Cheikh SARR
- [manet] (no subject) RuiZhe Wu
- [manet] (no subject) mariam dawod
- [manet] (no subject) nawel salhi
- [manet] (no subject) * najool *
- [manet] (no subject) shabana mehfuz
- [manet] (no subject) badis
- [manet] (no subject) zze-FAYAD Elie RD-CORE-CAE
- [manet] (no subject) mohammad diab
- [manet] (no subject) RuiZhe Wu
- [manet] (no subject) Amr Hussein
- [manet] (no subject) Justin Dean
- Re: [manet] RE: Comments on Metric TLV Teco Boot
- RE: [manet] RE: Comments on Metric TLV Justin Dean
- RE: [manet] (no subject) Justin Dean
- [manet] (no subject) Thomas Clausen
- [manet] Re: Russ White
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Charles E. Perkins
- [manet] Something I mis-read in Thomas's earlier … Charles E. Perkins
- [manet] (no subject) Ahmad Al-Zoubi
- [manet] (no subject) mlittle flower
- [manet] (no subject) amine elabidi
- [manet] (no subject) amine elabidi
- [manet] (no subject) amine elabidi
- [manet] (no subject) Rahul Goel
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Abdussalam Baryun
- [manet] (no subject) Abdussalam Baryun
- [manet] (no subject) Pr
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Joseph Macker
- [manet] (no subject) Jon Black
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Joseph Macker
- Re: [manet] (no subject) JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Jon Black
- Re: [manet] (no subject) JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Bo Berry
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Jon Black
- Re: [manet] Mobility and eMeters (was: no subject) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Don Sturek
- Re: [manet] (no subject) JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] Mobility and eMeters (was: no subject) Joe Macker
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Timothy J. Salo
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works C Chauvenet
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jiazi YI
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Joseph Macker
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Philip Levis
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Joe Macker
- Re: [manet] LOADng works C Chauvenet
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Daniel He
- Re: [manet] LOADng works JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Daniel He
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Joseph Macker
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works C Chauvenet
- Re: [manet] LOADng works C Chauvenet
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] LOADng works C Chauvenet
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Jon Black
- Re: [manet] LOADng works C Chauvenet
- Re: [manet] LOADng works Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [manet] (no subject) Sanjay Kumar
- [manet] (no subject) Joseph Macker