Re: [manet] next version of pause extension

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 08 November 2017 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E83127011 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:01:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wH0IesSg_WU9 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896FA126CD6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37344140719 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 07:01:12 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id XS181w00w2SSUrH01S1BgB; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:01:12 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=JNNLi4Cb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=sC3jslCIGhcA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=qFFMUCO_Gj5WzuIRyGAA:9 a=9jN64Z5hWbEEkvUl:21 a=2VqA6QWcjiNyYO7G:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=gUXmQ8eWAGYA:10 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zz/hS3r/aSsmdshSgJjLmTq1YsAEK9y0yrNsNmds2rc=; b=Rk3nTg2nvblIZogKwDJfogYfUa Aa1IuuGtzeCA193w/tIQV3YtUG13gplEcj9+pbpDt2nwTOvQRLyzMHgFL9lyvcTZJA1hZQlp5yMx1 fbyqQYlzeI/sUstIm6+pK1b0n;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:47216 helo=fs2.dc.labn.net) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1eCQui-000lXx-Ex; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:01:08 -0700
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Cc: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
References: <ffb93183-3ebd-39f2-4ca4-3a1b0e737146@labn.net> <CAGnRvuo2=OoHZPDWuvo94AnWJCHXyvOU9YGUSpNyEsxeSR2epw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <9fe45b7b-7d4a-1ff8-09b2-9d0048326081@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 09:01:07 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvuo2=OoHZPDWuvo94AnWJCHXyvOU9YGUSpNyEsxeSR2epw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1eCQui-000lXx-Ex
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net (fs2.dc.labn.net) [100.15.86.101]:47216
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/fzxACzmNyKqEjawgPGMaA-bkdDg>
Subject: Re: [manet] next version of pause extension
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:01:19 -0000

Henning,

see below.

On 11/08/2017 02:23 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
> Rick, Stan and me had also a discussion about this when talking about
> the "link ID" extension...

I followed the thread (I think) -- I was hoping we'd get some good time
in Singapore to discuss this - will you (and Rick+ Stan) be there?

> 
> I proposed the idea that we use "link IDs" to define multiple
> "versions" of a connection to the same target MAC address. This would
> also mean we could easily add a "this needs VLAN TOS x" or "this needs
> DSCP y" flag to a neighbor, which means we don't need to introduce
> "sub-TLVs".

I'm torn, the lid approach means a lot of added messaging to essentially
provide queue index semantics - but I also like the generic concepts of
LIDS (although I personally think LID length should be fixed per
session, not per spec.)

Given that lids are so immature, I don't think we should hold up pause.
Let's get it done and out there, and *if* we come up with something
better in a year or two we can deprecate pause.

Lou

> 
> Henning Rogge
> 
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>> Rick (all),
>>
>> When we last talked (ietf99, see
>> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-99-manet). I think we
>> agreed that draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-01 captured your
>> current thinking on "containers".  Are you still happy with the draft,
>> or do you think there is some change needed?  If the latter, obviously
>> let us know what change you'd like to see.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Lou
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>