Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01.txt

"JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B07C21F8C3E for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:40:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huDBUHPhj13W for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:40:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACBB21F8AD3 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:40:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11055; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1352324410; x=1353534010; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=fFINXyNfs5WhokA9bFNtIaR0IgHwNtRG8btUTeSY99E=; b=arM/85/Q7MhsWc42BH64/5UeMqDzqREItp6wxQPKimPxkCTxIKEDXNwd pSg/P8Lvq1GEhIGSDWc8PAdNLMbzeQVBYmC2ICR1WOKf4vxtIT0PHLG0C FgNhj/f/8+xkdeHqn7syyqcuvWyHyQRAoJBpZcxMo3euWHSDbAcjwcHAZ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAO3TmlCtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABEun+Ia4EIghoEAQEBBAEBAQ8BWwsQAgEIEQMBAgsdBycLFAkIAgQOBQgBCw6FJweCHhwLnESgL4wNhWZhA4gljnKKGoMjgWuCb4IZ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,732,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="136899012"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2012 21:40:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA7Le9pT008487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:40:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.118]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:40:09 -0600
From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
Thread-Topic: [manet] I-D Action: draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNvQGcakeklW33hUCFwBgPpdiMBg==
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:40:09 +0000
Message-ID: <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7722061BAC@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
References: <20121107142822.12100.51447.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7722060637@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <CAK=bVC9rZ_LCHQRdK8T5qe2tG_LOdVG2AHF6XNq3QMUViiTjfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC9rZ_LCHQRdK8T5qe2tG_LOdVG2AHF6XNq3QMUViiTjfw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.90.153]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19346.005
x-tm-as-result: No--47.546900-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7722061BACxmbrcdx02ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "manet@ietf.org List" <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:40:12 -0000

Hi Ulrich,

On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Ulrich Herberg wrote:

Hi JP,

The answer is: it depends. Some MANET deployments may use SNMP, other, more constrained MANETs don't.

JP> Absolutely.

For these more constrained networks, other protocols may be more suitable (or management may not be possible).


JP> It might be worth spelling it out clearly - happy to help.

Thanks.

JP.

Regard
Ulrich

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) <jvasseur@cisco.com<mailto:jvasseur@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear Authors,

Are you expecting to use SNMPv2 is constrained networks ? As you know, the IETF came up with different ways of managing
networks that are indeed constrained (CoRE).

Thanks.

JP.

Begin forwarded message:

From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
Subject: I-D Action: draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01.txt
Date: November 7, 2012 9:28:22 AM EST
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
Reply-To: <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


Title           : Definition of Managed Objects for the Lightweight On-demand Ad hoc Distance-vector Routing Protocol - Next Generation (LOADng)
Author(s)       : Ulrich Herberg
                         Robert G. Cole
                         Thomas Heide Clausen
Filename        : draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01.txt
Pages           : 43
Date            : 2012-11-07

Abstract:
  This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
  for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
  In particular, it describes objects for configuring parameters of the
  Lightweight On-demand Ad hoc Distance-vector Routing Protocol - Next
  Generation (LOADng) process on a router.  The MIB module defined in
  this memo, denoted LOADng-MIB, also reports state.  While LOADng is
  layer agnostic and can be run with different address families (e.g.,
  on L2 using MAC addreses, or on L3 using IP addresss), this MIB
  module assumes that LOADng is used on L3, and uses only IPv4/IPv6
  addresses.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-herberg-lln-loadng-mib-01


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org<mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt


_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org<mailto:manet@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet