Re: [manet] manet Digest, Vol 160, Issue 6

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Fri, 08 September 2017 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FAF132ED1 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 02:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1d_AEkSCZUH for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 02:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B1613236D for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 02:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r141so5002345qke.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ur1FbksbcgwAe+duRzGtJt2Urbs2obT3DBnelvzL+cs=; b=frKvuxXFJ6YnZu6PXcI+wb/amsy/6rvoKDuXdXZlyuZcBeRDQapQWU94Bh2iy7kYgY 6autNY2P+DvoSxf303axK/izX05QMBGbl7N3zsMX7wzoe792VT6RHtaOXUHnWVgp9HxH UbnCrHmtK1xilCGOXPW6okKr8hqVCBFXwciPcFw7OzieerloQ8x765ffj0yMu9K1Mxvx 5r/coQ5n4lFmtYuVKTtB9Jveb5l9C+SxNcgs9Vwu33CzeMZAwNRlI0yHqu/VCRNjNZhh dN9jUmsHnNlm/PYYEb/SawuWh1eLbb9pTxzNwYw5xp+PYesmqw10pt0kdpf84Tb2q93L ZVIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ur1FbksbcgwAe+duRzGtJt2Urbs2obT3DBnelvzL+cs=; b=mE1BQk0EBT52+UaVai9HrAQHcZiU0W5PpwvztX9enTiozqFC1TwT6g2tbm349gSq1B HQU2ePsm2YguUFvRnZ5GuVc5M7GY1QffDO5N9hWuDuU31Y8FFxyZ/noGYuRp8Tb5UPAE wljAkd7bWHhmAYGwz1bcwlB6n4LnjY5GcUPE0RpDQTHmIsVfixvPKKxWIyJiDViQJAXR AVycXzA4X+LHn3/q6Ra5aOpMruHKsJyTresZvl/FxTLA0V37RKVq11wXilqfCAq/tHmG mScg/Lke3jW8Y3aOIJd6KVPU7IUqyPOJO2PcHvVK2lQ/1gGrhWQoRUfjV1Wjgu9agENc vi8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgUEnqPFAcpxlcNf3VdlogUD/6nmnQgncw+S0s1hp6kmKt4LO3v bdKDkQx3p7llRh6udZt/+FoaqURF32sA7X3xdhI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAgq89hVzm2PrinSuf7HwL7YEPMoEPDMuSg/AFmPtKtFrMTSwteRuMzOYKpyYcGM9BA6ulXn43SVg1ItZrZu0c=
X-Received: by 10.55.27.66 with SMTP id b63mr2784901qkb.338.1504863461018; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.43.135 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 02:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1504862170.15735.11.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
References: <mailman.73.1504810812.22576.manet@ietf.org> <CAH8Jh6AU9DMugToM+tj7N+uMN8qMuDeLTfZb-4Nxq--fw3WXcA@mail.gmail.com> <1504862170.15735.11.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:37:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvupuwz0x72o-E-hss7pgtJbuzC==ZLiE0OjFrbrBwLUBAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, "james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com" <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/hP7pnVXadrGJnRWwiJJ4NwQj-Wg>
Subject: Re: [manet] manet Digest, Vol 160, Issue 6
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:37:44 -0000

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Rick Taylor
<rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> There was a draft extension that might exactly meet you requirements:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cheng-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-00
> .txt

I knew I had forgot something...

So this draft could be combined with a "IP routing" flag of the radio?

I am still a little bit worried about the "id" draft that removes the
mandatory MAC tlv from the Neighbor up/down/update messages.

Henning
>
> Cheers
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 17:55 -0500, James A. (Jim) Stevens wrote:
>> what about radio routing hops below IP, e.g. for a mesh network below
>> IP?
>>
>> This would tell the router how many radio hops (as contrasted to IP
>> hops) away a neighbor is.
>>
>> Jim Stevens
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:00 PM, <manet-request@ietf.org> wrote:
>> > Send manet mailing list submissions to
>> >         manet@ietf.org
>> >
>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> >         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> >         manet-request@ietf.org
>> >
>> > You can reach the person managing the list at
>> >         manet-owner@ietf.org
>> >
>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > than "Re: Contents of manet digest..."
>> >
>> >
>> > Today's Topics:
>> >
>> >    1. Thoughts on draft-dlep-lid (Henning Rogge)
>> >
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > -----
>> >
>> > Message: 1
>> > Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:57:53 +0200
>> > From: Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
>> > To: <manet@ietf.org>
>> > Subject: [manet] Thoughts on draft-dlep-lid
>> > Message-ID: <a5f491d1-b094-a797-c9dd-2fcf0afe5e07@fkie.fraunhofer.d
>> > e>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
>> >
>> > I had some time to look at draft-dlep-lid and there is one thing I
>> > am
>> > wondering about.
>> >
>> > I wonder if leaving out the MAC TLV is a bit too tough on many DLEP
>> > implementations, we are talking about the "primary key" for the
>> > neighbors.
>> >
>> > Whats about adding a "IP hops" TLV instead, which tells the router
>> > how
>> > many IP hops a neighbor is away?
>> >
>> > Default value would be zero (briding distance), but routing radios
>> > would
>> > report something like 2 (two routers in between, one on each
>> > radio).
>> >
>> > This value might also be useful later for "multihop routing"
>> > radios.
>> >
>> > Henning Rogge
>> > --
>> > Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut f?r
>> > Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
>> > Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
>> > Zanderstrasse 5, 53177 Bonn, Germany
>> > Telefon +49 228 50212-469
>> > mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.
>> > de
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > Subject: Digest Footer
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > manet mailing list
>> > manet@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > End of manet Digest, Vol 160, Issue 6
>> > *************************************
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet