Re: [manet] Working group last call for draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis and draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Chris,
 
I believe Abdussalam is referring to an email he sent on 3rd July this year
(although it would have been helpful had he made this clear).
 
In http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg16408.html he raised
some questions during the poll for document adoption. A quick, non-scientific,
and unthorough  scan of the archives does not show an answer.
 
I can't say that I can parse the referenced email with ease, but I think I see a
request to substantiate the assertion implicit in the draft that there is some
optimization benefit to the work. You might reasonably respond to that "allowing
immediate reinstatement of the symmetric 2-hop neighbor if the link quality
later improves sufficiently obviously makes the symmetric 2-hop neighborhood
more robust, and so the updates to the two RFCs clearly represents an
optimization."
 
I must say that I find it hard to correlate that old email with the new comment
that "there was an object the optimization draft to be a standard track with an
open questioning/discussion." I do not see any objection in the archive to the
publication of the draft on the Standards Track. All I see is a "vote" to not
adopt the I-D.
 
Abdussalam: You go on to say "I don't see reason/interest for my review for the
new update versions."  That's OK. There is no requirement for you to review this
document nor to send any email commenting on whether or not you have reviewed
it.
 
Adrian
 
 
From: Christopher Dearlove [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: 07 August 2014 22:49
To: Abdussalam Baryun
Cc: Stan Ratliff (sratliff); <[e-mail]>; manet-ads; manet
IETF; Thomas Clausen
Subject: Re: [manet] Working group last call for draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis and
draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization
 
WGLC is when discussion is held (and before it of course). I do not recall any
objection, nor open question.
 
 
On 7 Aug 2014, at 22:36, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:



My comment: there was an object the optimization draft to be a standard track
with an open questioning/discussion, however, no sign for reply from editors, so
I don't see reason/interest for my review for the new update versions. 
 
AB

On Thursday, August 7, 2014, Stan Ratliff (sratliff) wrote:
Working group participants,

This is a working group last call on the two documents mentioned above. Please
submit any issues or concerns via the list on or before August 21, 2014.

Regards,
Stan
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[e-mail] <javascript:;> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet