Re: [manet] DYMO Address Prefix length: discrepancy between DYMO and PacketBB drafts

"Ian Chakeres" <ian.chakeres@gmail.com> Thu, 20 April 2006 20:30 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWfnC-0007X5-8A; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:30:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWfnB-0007X0-2j for manet@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:30:21 -0400
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.194]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWfnA-0004dU-RU for manet@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:30:21 -0400
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so242024nzk for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hhj7XD3Gj6jDopY5bkyXiRA7SIYm+Li+KFmHptpCZBIit+ksp46fw39GVSg4JgAY9aEx3d4VGc8oowFPzHtqdUEcXXtW/gUB7Pvac2PkmNrviEwDlAnh2id/wIDM1AY2zp4UcMv3FHsFqbaBlRzX8Hx+YP22JnKs+WUSng7gDWQ=
Received: by 10.36.101.14 with SMTP id y14mr1263765nzb; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.18.44 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <374005f30604201330w475bb876y20b559389ac8715f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:30:20 -0700
From: Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Meis <meis@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: [manet] DYMO Address Prefix length: discrepancy between DYMO and PacketBB drafts
In-Reply-To: <200604202111.55117.meis@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200604202111.55117.meis@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Cc: manet@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org

Thanks for the comment. DYMO will agree with PacketBB.

DYMO-04 contains several typos related to packetbb, these should be
fixed in the next revision. If you find any others please feel free to
email me.

Ian Chakeres

On 4/20/06, Ulrich Meis <meis@i4.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> DYMO in all drafts states that if the prefix field is missing the prefix
> length is assumed to be 0.
> PacketBB on the other hand states that the prefix length, if absent, is
> considered to be equal to the address length. Certainly, this makes more
> sense and saves implementations from having to handle this case differently.
>
> My guess is that DYMO has adopted its default from AODV where 31 is the
> maximum for this field since it has only 5 bits. IPv4's address length of 32
> cannot be represented. Although DYMO in draft 03 already reserved 6-7 bits
> for this field(depends if you read page 7 or 12).
>
> In my opinion DYMO and PacketBB should have the same prefix length semantics.
> However, if that is not desired, I'd suggest to state this fact in upcoming
> DYMO drafts to avoid confusion.
>
> Relevant sections:
> ------------------------------------
> draft-ietf-manet-dymo-04.txt
> Page 10:
>
> RM should contain a Prefix for each address that is not a host
>          address.  If a prefix is not included in conjunction with an
>          address, it is assumed zero (host address only).  For more
>          information on advertising a Prefix see Section 4.7.
>
> ------------------------------------
> draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-00.txt
> Page 13:
>
> An address SHALL NOT appear more than once in the same message
>       with the same prefix length (an address without a PREFIX-LENGTH
>       TLV is considered to have a prefix length equal to the address
>       length);
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Uli
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet