IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] AD Review of draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 23 June 2016 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDB612E2AB; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bo0M_CrJro8s; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23C7127058; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4481; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466679614; x=1467889214; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=lst5x2DzkXbSPrgTo43mw6sgh1EZGoKV8hwQ6xWERgM=; b=OPwhp8tYZZGWzKU41G2Ru163jrFTcdtORNmBk9nfkGjQ+Ux9TKzPFBtN lEKgVGQe+39DTllmEfq7IVYsrgHY9DxXljNOFDVFTmgdMXrZVPYgsemev gSkoUGg2FDWicrKD+jfqDVSM0/lhak7IMizunMG6QCDulplG97rY/o4mb o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CvBQCIwGtX/4ENJK1dgnBOVn0GtTKFAYF6hhcCgS45EwEBAQEBAQFlJ4RNAQEELUwQAgEIPwcyFBECBAENBYgwxkQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchieETYobBY4xhRqFNAGOMI8kj30BIAMxg3BuiSV/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,516,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="289147536"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Jun 2016 11:00:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5NB0Dnm008327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:00:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:00:12 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:00:12 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, "draft-ietf-manet-credit-window@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-credit-window@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04
Thread-Index: AQHRy+wAa7+0C+fEHkOeHxNkPsT4mp/2wBswgAA1noA=
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:00:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D391368F.13058E%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D3874F53.12E5F6%aretana@cisco.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D923D19DC@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
In-Reply-To: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D923D19DC@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D391368F13058Earetanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/jgDdqdXoolBhmlXoxk9o2SXBUWg>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, "manet-chairs@ietf.org" <manet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] AD Review of draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:00:16 -0000

On 6/23/16, 4:54 AM, "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com<mailto:chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>> wrote:

Christopher:

Hi!

Termination is, unless a late change that I've missed was made, a standard DLEP behaviour. So if there's an issue, it's probably a general DLEP issue rather than just a credit window issue.

I don't have an issue with the Terminate Failure Mode; you're right, it is in the base spec.

I have an issue with using the Terminate Failure Mode to reset the DLEP session if one of the credit windows falls out of sync (the ID says "...mismatch in the presence or absence of credit window data items...").  I have an issue with that because terminating the DLEP session would have an impact well beyond the one destination credit window we're trying to fix.

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email