IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Help needed!

Vivek raghunathan <vivek.raghunathan@gmail.com> Fri, 29 October 2004 02:59 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA29034 for <manet-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:59:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNND3-0001jL-Tl for manet-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:13:51 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNMGH-0007ZW-OF; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:13:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNJqZ-0002fe-2V for manet@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:38:23 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13731 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:38:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNK4i-0004S7-EK for manet@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:53:01 -0400
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so561069wri for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AhY7uOWita11XJeVxuWt3BWnA6ehAZ5ODPDsgRq+kvwapdSvtDX8i54B/ui5awWLuccKWZ+R/Biohlgd5FJdHRBXQsSmNBrX42XJxlKvewg84cc5lnZlvdm5mDmMm8bU+FU69ftg7agRat//6UOuHiN3UuygDhi8v8HvrXOjmwU=
Received: by 10.38.76.16 with SMTP id y16mr1619806rna; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.152.32 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <645d37c5041028163761dba794@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:37:25 -0500
From: Vivek raghunathan <vivek.raghunathan@gmail.com>
To: srgopal@olemiss.edu
Subject: Re: [manet] Help needed!
In-Reply-To: <41809cf6.11.2a0.979336357@olemiss.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <41809cf6.11.2a0.979336357@olemiss.edu>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: manet@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Vivek raghunathan <vivek.raghunathan@gmail.com>
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rja,

Yan Wu, a Masters student with Prof. P. R. Kumar's group at UIUC, had done
a study of the voice call carrying capacity of wireless networks. You can
contact Prof. P. R. Kumar (prkumar@uiuc.edu) for a copy of her Masters
thesis.

-Vivek



On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:17:10 -0500, srgopal <srgopal@olemiss.edu> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> Did anyone work with packet voice transmission in mobile
> Ad-Hoc networks? If you have done or know of some published
> work please let me know.
> Is 2% packet loss and 200 ms one-way delay tolerable in
> Voice transmissions in analyzing the voice call carrying
> capacity performance of an Ad-Hoc network?
> 
> Thanks for your time and patience.
> Regards,
> Rja.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email