IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage-04.txt

ietf@thomasclausen.org Mon, 30 May 2016 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4C112D0DB; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thomasclausen.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycXc2ccjGn7y; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CC012D0FD; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DF426324E; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thomasclausen.org; s=1.tigertech; t=1464624237; bh=d4sxJsiAr/ry3TMbkT8hTXt0C0kMIeP3sSHwJG+kxZ0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=dmRrWsVyCdm5Kwb0lyfJOF//5B0Dv1kIAtqBeED2djOuLnX9ApVMrOD5A9oKhlUmT hjvt3l6YtdPzHwQKQRlMKHolC0sfLNj/LWIgtsMGqTOpnwUuHgz0Pq9HUD34W0f/5X WpvOyPytsAHmUnjqX/zoATu8IVAqUYLz8ojRxavU=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from [129.104.89.231] (unknown [129.104.89.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE96A2408A3; Mon, 30 May 2016 09:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ABAB396E-7D4B-47DD-B8F7-B0A6A3D7DB6D"
From: ietf@thomasclausen.org
In-Reply-To: <CALtoyom9tAh+e-EctDscpanXZ2ZOt9kEjmZvVfZFhVpwSh6GPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:03:50 +0200
Sendlaterdate: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:03:50 +0200
Message-Id: <7B2659F0-40E1-4DEC-AE65-D9C027198BC9@thomasclausen.org>
References: <20160504170444.8256.99788.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D923B30CF@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CA+-pDCd03jsxPXdFFxrc1ndfAf9RWtJa2t9cZNZ77yGr+_s2sQ@mail.gmail.com> <F8A0654E-4878-4083-B212-4B43A8F68527@thomasclausen.org> <CALtoyom9tAh+e-EctDscpanXZ2ZOt9kEjmZvVfZFhVpwSh6GPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/njFwRkUkFY9E4I_EePif0JQM4XA>
Cc: manet-ads@ietf.org, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, Christopher Dearlove <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-rfc5444-usage-04.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 16:04:00 -0000

Mr. Ratliff,

> On 23 May 2016, at 17:17, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mr. Clausen, 
> 
> The referenced discussion did take place.

Very well.

Given that you affirmed a week ago that:

> The consensus going forward was to begin the post-WGLC effort (e.g. find a document shepherd, do  the write-up, etc). 

I believe that it is legitimate to ask: has any progress been made by the chairs on those post-WGLC efforts?

WGLC closed 4+ weeks ago on this document. 

Thomas



> 
> Regards,
> Stan
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Thomas Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org <mailto:ietf@thomasclausen.org>> wrote:
> So, how did that conversation with Mr. Ratliff go? Unless I've missed a datatracker notification, motion has grind to a halt regarding this doc?
> 
> Thomas
> 
> --
> Thomas Heide Clausen  <mailto:Thomas.Clausen@polytechnique.edu> •  @thclausen  <http://twitter.com/thclausen> 	• 	thomasclausen.org  <http://www.thomasclausen.org/>
> www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/thomasheideclausen.html <http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats/thomasheideclausen.html>
> 
> On 05 May 2016, at 05:55, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com <mailto:bebemaster@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Ack. I'll talk with Stan ASAP and keep things moving.
>> 
>> Justin
>> 
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com <mailto:chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>> wrote:
>> This includes all of the issues I listed in my previous email of comments made at WGLC.
>> 
>> The authors request starting all the post-WGLC things to do.
>> 
>> --
>> Christopher Dearlove
>> Senior Principal Engineer
>> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Laboratories
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email