IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7183 (5144)

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Wed, 04 October 2017 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D768F13320B for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=herberg.name
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J1Q1uklNdVhp for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4502E1332D7 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m28so2097410pfi.11 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2bjYLCUMXnTNoLyFY1zY+4YgeEon8Lp2YPBg9ncN6ls=; b=jKJplRpxGnA51NtEl8EvI1HAfMM3ZwvVeC1WN3I0ou4WVv4fZ67jL2dCayzzSYLs8I hQnRWdf9A0LHTHXRlh8m2aV7DLhvpPWsK1rm0z5ZN14hbFpLVS5HoPdeuJCHztNLDooT wZW7TxSkvujY99cV8OyEtN6hMo7prpTGOeNBs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2bjYLCUMXnTNoLyFY1zY+4YgeEon8Lp2YPBg9ncN6ls=; b=Er6eTlQ56fHoEL2z3twhsUjNxRITO+sIWz+W+ykwN6cCFCS5sNQPaKXLudg+GhlYwO yG2uIfoeFBo16cW/OtWLlY6QnJZMZHapZEunEWIyZOgaDncOI+NPNy69M8FPpq1U9I7f 8ydPuZ155s4fB3se8Xqro6yDJ3x4l9AbQ1JwRUHTCnANAoS+L8RbDBKhk/wDjCyA6HK0 rcfKLL99YbSKKdBKqN/mvQCCI5Tmc65uQHy9mfHeqLwTk9eoiFz14GCjKwwUqJgi95JP 3o0cX282moySb+ExWqvyR6OAyZ0lfZwPJVgnTzrTUZODjiwQAnX8J6OFEFpoE0cmnAKi kTVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXaq02lRh9/aFsI4Io/COaqTdLVyqmEghyvOO0P3p/OWVqh8crU W7QoXdf3ZhrcjDsy7AlaZxgxtGBMuI+/iPnIOe3+9A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDxfiIJzr/Ue4qv/C99VXt5wat67yfbBTLpgyi2PIzFfAcyxNkuO08+33YO7o55X8SCLYr63CQLJDRWpAM7x+E=
X-Received: by 10.99.170.1 with SMTP id e1mr1480381pgf.12.1507159451579; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.166.39 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51F0FCF5-F994-416E-A877-375FFFEA0E2C@gmail.com>
References: <20171004210233.35D8CB80DD2@rfc-editor.org> <51F0FCF5-F994-416E-A877-375FFFEA0E2C@gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:24:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC_4JW5qmcimq7jD_Yfre=STqF=nXMjpvLqdNcy_YMVUpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, Thomas Clausen <T.Clausen@computer.org>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, db3546@att.com, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>, Stan Ratliff <sratliff@idirect.net>, manet@ietf.org, denis@ovsienko.info
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/nzNdGRMrrHcJ7o4Xs6a2Qv8WnpA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:24:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7183 (5144)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 23:24:14 -0000

I agree. Good catch!

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Christopher Dearlove
<christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> wrote:
> (Co-author.)
>
> Yes, that’s a good erratum and should be accepted. Thanks to Denis and annoyance to self for letting it through.
>
> Christopher
>
>
>> On 4 Oct 2017, at 22:02, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7183,
>> "Integrity Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5144
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Denis Ovsienko <denis@ovsienko.info>
>>
>> Section: 8.1.3
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>   is contained in message.  As an attacker cannot modify the content of
>>   this timestamp (as it is protected by the identity check value), an
>>   attacker cannot replay messages after this time.  Within this time
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>   is contained in message.  As an attacker cannot modify the content of
>>   this timestamp (as it is protected by the integrity check value), an
>>   attacker cannot replay messages after this time.  Within this time
>>
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Integrity check value (ICV) is the means of protection in this document.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC7183 (draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec-05)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Integrity Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)
>> Publication Date    : April 2014
>> Author(s)           : U. Herberg, C. Dearlove, T. Clausen
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email