Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 02:17 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690141A0211 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tm2Cyg0nw7Mo for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9211A0222 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgdq107 with SMTP id q107so25331607qgd.6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DQ9RS4aUD3f8HEjG8V1nrHINcuqdaNeUMH0rvjdHU74=; b=ml4l4PMEW1DzPr9WacNkhu3MZogqZUpQoEBLaHe3Ai8zoq91wNUD7QUS23OwiwaH2W SHn4cdaHPATfKvDEiSlLTGg7E0YTFKWClLjKM8wS5NHDifT3wL6w89UQ7tDByW9WnQhi AYmxJA98qScMwLFJFizhp1lZlDfRY8Y7403xOloQgKpGtdUgDn8DIGJCkwTea/ZbdSx3 S6ZikK0c0EVX6HWb1z2xHJ9/NyOM4jI7Tg3bFj86wFtpeWd5EdX71JUnUbP7dz53XhVr n6A2ig7dnPbyUibBlp7ykXRm2eZEkGez/NBTYUAZLbCqC8qAVAy4vfx/CFs0V/7WJr4c b8HQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.42.39 with SMTP id q39mr33854648qkh.99.1425867467747; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.108.183 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D40E60A38@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
References: <20150220172420.9870.30340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADnDZ882A6jrAX81v81voL9AprotU9GFSxd19z48GH+Ma7K1PA@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D40E60A38@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 04:17:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_8TzLOyVeABBtPMw==8gWyTj544=8BvjryWZZQ8ufsYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11494270e977310510d1a3d5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/smhJCHtfq7MkEAi6Gx3xQ8vFX4A>
Cc: "manet-ads@tools.ietf.org" <manet-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 02:17:51 -0000

Ok, I will wait for the judgement call from WG AD. However, my advise is to
not update our single topology standards with multitopology, and to leave
it separate from multitopology standards.

AB

On Wednesday, March 4, 2015, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
chris.dearlove@baesystems.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','chris.dearlove@baesystems.com');>> wrote:

>  That this updates OLSRv2 is inherent in the specification. If the draft
> didn’t make that explicit, that was an editorial oversight, nothing more.
> Whether it updates 7188 (and XXXX which is tlv-naming) is a matter of
> taste, we put that in in order that our AD can make a judgement call.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Christopher Dearlove
>
> Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
> Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
> Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>
> chris.dearlove@baesystems.com | http://www.baesystems.com
>
> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
> Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>
>
>
> *From:* manet [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Abdussalam
> Baryun
> *Sent:* 04 March 2015 17:02
> *To:* internet-drafts@ietf.org
> *Cc:* manet@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [manet] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> **** WARNING ****
>
> *This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an
> external partner or the internet.*
>
> * Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any
> attachments or reply. For information regarding **Red Flags** that you
> can look out for in emails you receive, click here
> <http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Red%20Flags.pdf>.*
> * If you feel the email is suspicious, please follow this process
> <http://intranet.ent.baesystems.com/howwework/security/spotlights/Documents/Dealing%20With%20Suspicious%20Emails.pdf>.*
>
> Did the WG agree to allow this draft to update 7181 and 7188? This new
> draft has added the update!!!
>
>
>
> AB
>
> On Friday, February 20, 2015, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group of
> the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Multi-Topology Extension for the Optimized Link
> State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2)
>         Authors         : Christopher Dearlove
>                           Thomas Heide Clausen
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05.txt
>         Pages           : 21
>         Date            : 2015-02-20
>
> Abstract:
>    This specification describes an extension to the Optimized Link State
>    Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) to support multiple routing
>    topologies, while retaining interoperability with OLSRv2 routers that
>    do not implement this extension.
>
>    This specification updates RFC 7181 by creating an interoperable
>    extension to it.  This specification updates RFC 7188 and RFC XXXX by
>    modifying and extending TLV registries and descriptions.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology-05
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>