[manet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04.txt

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Sun, 10 April 2016 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF17512B02B for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DKNr1xNBGyzJ for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2DB612B019 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x235.google.com with SMTP id kb1so65800073igb.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=/Qmclkf92W1lzBiUK02X+6mvbyhisGl1aMxdyX3luD8=; b=e52EHW5WhsDbksBT7XzXJqo0mNqbKbmi7S6FTkUnTcFsEMEPZQyBSb0WWZi0RndIoE oNu83A43umd6V1iZIk6ERSxe6xsaF4iS3fkkFFhMsZo6yAZWLX/qmIPZka2LlufMCipD wenG6Eg6W1gGMDE/b+zWyRQopuvma31O2na8A4ni2fMDvp3+XQ4V3fmUNRqCXK5zBZFg Pcb+gCkXtkNg5rpmWacZHX+LxszRxXyNAPHpb0WPby/5hvOUhEfgidEvyYNwD//2Gie8 ZvrARVkvbhEH644X7irII2mRzMA04y/QLLeEwaedwIgvy+X9na7D4qODfTi4M4VqaEWM 2SAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=/Qmclkf92W1lzBiUK02X+6mvbyhisGl1aMxdyX3luD8=; b=CUmFYhR1SxJVXAIaJwtpNpvXDOZGhW3E/y0EiqLfbffGL9Y2v9oveK4p7lwOnk1Ly1 CAzeYGp/ACvL2cUzCHrcfMwHr9OGgl4+gvlTLsMq4PxdHxTs6TNWJCjnoJ+cdnMZOYkz Dhc2m1VVkt27zvvq2oST8KGSv7XhF9Wrn5NOaH9NBSlQnfx2N/z2G10Q4t+rM+i4xV8L GFr/vW3bC9xsDPp6DHbFu45NsDblR90h7rNL0m0/W6a7v7cByPjxYtGtQBev8XOU4Riz VPO0NghEQE5moew5gSPRRQcHCTaaA2warABvj8lm/42CSzY4z5QAR1SYaznYb1SeZWhF fzmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKJWL/24KUN/Tdm15UDQ52lsaQgkLEEx2N88AKzhDc03KajbD+lYJCgq1vlD1ke0+NAVstjz4GTfcv59w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.73.133 with SMTP id l5mr13728840igv.69.1460303527198; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.96.1 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160410154940.10332.91090.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160410154940.10332.91090.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:52:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CALtoyonb=akAknuDMe9t2vz6Yb5CMnrFyR1Dbg0dH9g1fb5Hmg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
To: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0129483a00c8cf0530236953"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/uF12auv7je2rvQAgve5abUQrwFw>
Subject: [manet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:52:10 -0000

Hello WG,

As you can see, I've posted DLEP credit-window 04. This posting just
addresses issues from the 'idnits' tool prior to the AD reviews.

Regards,
Stan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:49 AM
Subject: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04.txt
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: manet@ietf.org



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks of the IETF.

        Title           : Credit Windowing extension for DLEP
        Author          : Stan Ratliff
        Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04.txt
        Pages           : 12
        Date            : 2016-04-10

Abstract:
   This draft describes an extension to the DLEP protocol to provide a
   credit-windowing scheme analogous to that in RFC5578 for destination-
   specific flow control.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-credit-window/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-credit-window-04


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet