RE: [manet] AODV or DSR
"Mullen, John" <jomullen@ad.nmsu.edu> Thu, 26 May 2005 15:37 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DbKQ7-0000Tl-Oo; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:37:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DbKQ6-0000Td-02 for manet@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:37:14 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA06837 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:37:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.nmsu.edu ([128.123.34.79] helo=exchange1.ACN.ad.nmsu.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DbKif-0003ly-79 for manet@ietf.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:56:28 -0400
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [manet] AODV or DSR
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 09:37:03 -0600
Message-ID: <8536FDFA3AD04A49A158049159965691030A3283@exchange1.ACN.ad.nmsu.edu>
Thread-Topic: [manet] AODV or DSR
Thread-Index: AcViAYvtHBE4XoC7ROKS18g8Y1z3GgABS3HQ
From: "Mullen, John" <jomullen@ad.nmsu.edu>
To: manet@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Rafael, There are other differences, though I'm not sure of recent changes. One I remember is that DSR begins to send a message as soon as it identifies a route, but may change that route if a better one comes up, while AODV waits to be reasonably sure that it has enough information to select a best route before beginning to send. And, as far as I know, DSR is alive and well. The IETF database lists http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-dsr-10.txt As an active document, in spite of its age. John Mullen -----Original Message----- From: manet-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:manet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rafael Paoliello Guimaraes Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:44 AM To: manet@ietf.org Subject: [manet] AODV or DSR Hello all, I was simulating some extensions for the AODV protocol and in one of this extensions I would need to record all the path that a RREQ goes through and then send it back to the source node through RREP. But then I was thinking that if it shouldn't be the case of using DSR instead. Isn't this the big difference between DSR and AODV (route recording)? Or are there any other relevant differences that I am not taking into account? Just to complete, what is the actual state of DSR? It's not an RFC yet, is it? Was its standarization abandonned? Cheers, =========================================== Rafael Paoliello Guimaraes PhD Student - Computer Networking Group Department of Computer Architecture (DAC) Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) Phone: +34-934017187 Fax: +34-934017055 URL: http://people.ac.upc.es/rpaoliel =========================================== _______________________________________________ manet mailing list manet@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet _______________________________________________ manet mailing list manet@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
- [manet] AODV or DSR Rafael Paoliello Guimaraes
- RE: [manet] AODV or DSR Mullen, John
- RE: [manet] AODV or DSR Dave Maltz
- Re: [manet] AODV or DSR Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [manet] AODV or DSR VĂtor Jesus