Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node"
Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> Fri, 04 April 2014 22:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B401A0184 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rxbu1EucIJ7p for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794721A016E for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26056240462; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.147.236] (mtg91-1-82-227-24-173.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.24.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CC82241230; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
References: <061.9544556e01d71f4a3bc37047a820e1cd@trac.tools.ietf.org> <CADnDZ8-=SRsh+NxoO5R=r+Y6fzVKqHQPfcdwWrLfuLywCMypDQ@mail.gmail.com> <BB4B54B3-E531-4192-B72E-EC9E98A8C0BA@thomasclausen.org> <83809521-D655-4BCD-88E8-FF19AA99DCE2@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <83809521-D655-4BCD-88E8-FF19AA99DCE2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <16E8741D-4D80-477E-A5D5-EDB3D96148DF@thomasclausen.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D167)
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 00:29:07 +0200
To: Joe Macker <jpmacker@gmail.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/zCWQoP9Hm3TeW68vM1vYkrB1nNc
Cc: "draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2@tools.ietf.org>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node"
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:29:21 -0000
I don't think that I claimed that 2501 did any of those things, Joe. -- Thomas Heide Clausen http://www.thomasclausen.org "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." - Nikola Tesla, Modern Mechanics and Inventions, July, 1934 > On 5 avr. 2014, at 00:23, Joe Macker <jpmacker@gmail.com> wrote: > > RFC 2501 was not mandating terminology nor did it claim to. > > It was an informational document to raise issues and design considerations relating to a particular problem space. > > And certainly there are always more issues to consider than it raised at the time. > > -joe > > "To everything there is a season. A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to model using a graph" > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> wrote: >> >> 3561 did it wrong. >> >> What is the definition of "node"? >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 4 avr. 2014, at 01:20, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think draft uses node and router the same way it is used in the RFC3561 which is good. The AODVv2 is protocol between nodes. >>> >>> AB >>> >>> On Thursday, April 3, 2014, manet issue tracker wrote: >>> #30: Use of word "node" >>> >>> (Thomas Clausen) I find the use of "node" unfortunate. I would much prefer >>> "router", as this is a protocol running between routers. This applies both >>> in the text and in the "terminology mnemonics". I note that the text >>> sometimes uses "router" and sometimes "node", and it is not clear that/if >>> there is a difference, or if there should be a difference. The word >>> "Router Client" is also used (albeit inconsistently capitalized) as is >>> "client". >>> >>> An application running on a host has very, very specific expectations as >>> to how the underlying IP link behaves. Applications "Expect an IP Link >>> that looks like an Ethernet". I believe that it was Dave Thaler that once >>> said something like "don't expect Microsoft to rewrite their IP stack..." >>> Applications expect what they expect. Even, a protocol such as NDP, which >>> an IPv6-host uses to (among other things) configure its interfaces has >>> this expectation. Therefore, unless the goal is to explicitly not support >>> general applications and general IP stacks, an appropriate link model must >>> be presented to hosts. >>> >>> Yes, links between MANET routers are not "looking like an Ethernet". >>> That's quite alright, as long as the *only* application seeing these >>> "MANET links" is the routing application. Expose the weirdness of "a >>> MANET link" to an off-the-shelf app or protocol (such as NDP, mDNS, ...), >>> and unpredictable behaviour ensures. >>> >>> The way that other MANET routing protocols have taken is, to provide an IP >>> hop isolation of the hosts (which run "off the shelf applications") from >>> the "MANET links": in other words, a "regular IP link" ties the "host" to >>> the "router" and the "router" then has one or more interfaces towards the >>> "MANET links". >>> >>> -- >>> -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- >>> Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-manet- >>> charliep@computer.org | aodvv2@tools.ietf.org >>> Type: defect | Status: new >>> Priority: minor | Milestone: >>> Component: aodvv2 | Version: >>> Severity: Active WG | Keywords: >>> Document | >>> -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/manet/trac/ticket/30> >>> manet <http://tools.ietf.org/manet/> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> manet mailing list >>> manet@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >>> _______________________________________________ >>> manet mailing list >>> manet@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list >> manet@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >
- [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Teco Boot
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Teco Boot
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Jiazi YI
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Timothy J. Salo
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Clausen
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Timothy J. Salo
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Joe Macker
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Joe Macker
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Joe Macker
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Heide Clausen
- [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Daniel He
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #30 (aodvv2): Use of word "node" manet issue tracker