[Manycouches] reactions to draft-manycouches-completely-virtual-meetings-04

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 07 March 2017 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23E5129582 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:11:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=OIkB4ouj; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=MBoAq84J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38Z4h62ylIrw for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78714129565 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953AD2069B for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:11:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:11:38 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=1VE01cwOk6ypGx6sbEFnOrQceZw=; b=OIkB4o ujm0d6k/zOpJecvSNMNjnX4Jg6m/PGyD/3uJmTMGe+uFI2X81bt47wRaPbm0cpyj bX/wNnamxfXYdC7UXmreQfOzwV3IE6mXQnOWss0OoDpvKYseCEmpqbDVKCosm1d2 kOKAQBSAQHSS2HfnfQ1BxNNg6B7PkoXa/qOZE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=1VE01cwOk6ypGx 6sbEFnOrQceZw=; b=MBoAq84JkjYnV7xOjoawjEE7nSd7nbye2+3lY0ClW3hQLJ b3W6LsougowrNQGY699gPoSY7j9cQr4v53MsANYU2U01HyN78PyNygqvCpJKEqjS RRXJFff23iryVopDeZu6ZD2NnGmuliI6tyvnLwWPq7NkSHLGrwMZI7Rf5gqi4=
X-ME-Sender: <xms:yum-WA1NjkUWjs6tnc4elTKOC0MbPMD9L70RrtoMHO6dU89rCEWshw>
X-Sasl-enc: XojQGynffv8J94rifRvaEmAo2I9k41GijglAAkTXnL12 1488906698
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8816.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.176]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 195A12444E for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:11:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5634BDC-3EAC-433A-9C19-7F52114610CC@cooperw.in>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:11:36 -0500
To: "<manycouches@ietf.org>" <manycouches@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/_jcUQp3ahux3qWKANnkWirlDG3k>
Subject: [Manycouches] reactions to draft-manycouches-completely-virtual-meetings-04
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:11:40 -0000

I mentioned this on the call we just had but since not everyone was on I wanted to share a couple of thoughts I had after re-reading draft-manycouches-completely-virtual-meetings-04.

I think the draft is looking pretty comprehensive as far as listing out questions and issues for consideration. I think a useful next step might be to identify which of the questions/decisions are weightiest for the use case of an all-virtual, non-emergency meeting. For example, to my mind one of the toughest issues to sort out is how we would do the WG scheduling in such a way to maximize producitivity and participation, given time zone issues. This is basically a gating issue, whereas, say, whether or not we have t-shirts would not be. I wonder if the set of truly gating factors for having an all-virtual meeting could be selected out of the doc, and serve as the basis for some subset of folks to try to work up a strawman proposal for how to address them.

We also talked about trying to get more community members involved in the manycouches effort, given how oversubscribed many of us are. We all might want to try to think of a few folks who might be induced to join/lead here and see if we can pull them in during IETF 98.

Should we schedule time to meet f2f at IETF 98? If anyone wants to allocate time to trying to do the issue identification mentioned above or otherwise further developing ideas in this space between now and the meeting, then it seems like getting together could be useful.

Alissa