IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] [Wpack] wpack - Not having a session at IETF 109

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Mon, 12 October 2020 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B9D3A0A13; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZKL5ibIA2Bmz; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62ECC3A0A08; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id v6so1245002lfa.13; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rrgnp49PdCABUrsmh0ImqGxUVo9sYygwThpbf49YuOE=; b=mxeCxYOz5mX7tPxYN1cyEhrFFlBLVi7PVGuI00y6jJfzyY9Y9xF/IKQsOkELF2oytm 6oetArtlT5ckCpTDf7yQ6DSFpYY9+7Ycx/H1kUa3gTqTkJ6laPdgqF73iwlv43n6krEn BDQMlRxDQUn3rOwGaifwHhyjrgVAsFRtX9kbTXgIXFy5hH5hTAcdAPRhySlP672cTeTd yCMZ1aawiO5iZTuU/niQMx6l1RGNMXuBfrs38t1vGDB3JQdTysi/vL3WpkbIE0CgC2Eu bGtiohWrBQ8gnOgyvSBWcRqQa3WJ4Mg678dCLsQl/yUluVXbg8qUblX5c751qdcOgq+Q Q0xw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HWArC+0DIVA/F2EvS7L77DSK3ElNIVlbSTYZniF1gn5rAAtPB 92UhdteFq+Cn5AO/fnSJmTTxb9kw/H5O772mj38=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUo3x4SmAeV/DPNgL2TY5q6po+PUGG2+nAhZ5VqDnkse/N9mJibluf1V1svrsLZSoShiD2YJeJ0WgS34fWrls=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:9150:: with SMTP id y16mr4447607lfj.190.1602475707465; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7738D28F-1EE4-4EF3-8558-F9ED321EEDEA@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <7738D28F-1EE4-4EF3-8558-F9ED321EEDEA@sn3rd.com>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:08:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKq15ve2=jTT7t-GqSHHgf_fwMeK5c-PMXeKRxQYuSSbZNQOSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, manycouches@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Cc: WPACK List <wpack@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004e064a05b17173a9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/jSNitwhXoFfiNW2Ced5GRA9GkDs>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] [Wpack] wpack - Not having a session at IETF 109
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List is a design team list to identify issues that would arise should an IETF meeting ever be held with O\(1000\) 'remote' participants." <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:08:31 -0000

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:13 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> Because of the low volume of list traffic, Dave and I decided to not
> submit a session request for IETF 109.
>
> We can always request a virtual interim if needed.
>
> spt
> _______________________________________________
> Wpack mailing list
> Wpack@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack
>

I'm disappointed that WPACK isn't meeting at IETF 109. My impression was
that there was quite a bit of activity in the Git repo issue list. I was
hoping to be able to ask about two use cases for "packaging" web content.
(The use cases aren't important for this note but I'll say they are "save
this as mht" multipart/related and (2) the archival case of PDF/A, why
people want to save something and have more confidence that people 30 years
from now will be able to read the documents. That might address the dilemma
of spec-iing what the RFC SVG capabilities are uncertain.

now perhaps you'll say these concerns are "out of scope" but perhaps there
are other groups also deciding "attending" an IETF meeting is optional.


--
https://LarryMasinter.net <http://larry.masinter.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email