Re: [Manycouches] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rob,

Thanks for the comments. They're addressed and merged here:
https://github.com/martinduke/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/pull/14

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:01 AM Robert Wilton via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for driving this document.
>
> A couple of minor comments:
>
> 1. MUST consult with the community on the reason(s)
>
> This is just a nit, but this could be read as having a discussion with the
> community about why the meeting cannot proceed as scheduled (E.g.,
> analyzing
> why the hotel failed).  I presume that the intended consultation should be
> just
> what the IETF/LLC should do about it.
>
> 2. Consulting with the community on the form of the assessment report.
>
> Although I have no objection to the LLC doing this, I don't really see
> this as
> something that must be consulted on.  Discussing the content seems fine,
> but
> needing to consult on what the report looks like feels like a step too far
> to
> me.
>
> Regards,
> Rob
>
>
>
>