Re: [Manycouches] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

Hi Zahed:

Your comment is applied in this PR, and already merged:
https://github.com/martinduke/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/pull/12


On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:04 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for the efforts put in this document and in the discussions.
>
> I would suggest this - " This document provides criteria to aid the IETF
> Administration LLC
>    (LLC) in deciding to postpone, move, or cancel an in-person IETF
>    meeting." to be added in the abstract of this document to make the
> purpose
>    more clear.
>
> Then I agree with Ben's comment that his document seems also helping IESG
> and
> IRTF chair in the assessment (see section 3 ) hence wondering if that also
> should be clear in the purpose statement made in this document.
>
>
>
>