IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] Reviewers for draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 20 April 2012 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444C221F860E for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DP0aI3K66RKH for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82B721F860D for <marf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5564520E409F; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1334893888; bh=HgpraV/btrwdcSVP8P6IBEPduFyi9MXkZhE/9j4BLD0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=Q9l1BTCZ2GBx1HfAITY6gVCYf6QUfeWRLOIIm5ATN4pSynfaHqzcli7884y4jbg4M ZDu9L81i453GOfrgNm3J01A9Ktn7rVqGSIdCBIrpGQt6Rlv3IGK2Ra54AYIZF83Dfu CW/D22AkLl1nmEMDtUKeGfEnsLGfu99JBmgtMOV0=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4794720E408F; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: marf@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:51:27 -0400
Message-ID: <1432910.0rdicqnaN1@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.2.0-23-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <7038EA71-76F7-470F-B7FD-2BD3F18B5F5B@wordtothewise.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FAF8D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FB7E9@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <7038EA71-76F7-470F-B7FD-2BD3F18B5F5B@wordtothewise.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [marf] Reviewers for draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:51:29 -0000

On Thursday, April 19, 2012 05:24:32 PM Steve Atkins wrote:
...
> I don't think it will be of any value to report recipients or senders (for
> the reasons above) but that's no reason not to standardize it.
...

Sure it is.  Additional complexity doesn't come for free, so it shouldn't be 
accepted without reason.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email