Re: [marf] WGLC starting for draft-ietf-marf-base-01

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Mon, 12 April 2010 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: marf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433FE3A6A49 for <marf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndrSbD9gfAXl for <marf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A76E3A6AAC for <marf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rpco-bhill.rpcorp.local (np34.co.returnpath.net [38.109.196.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o3CJSR8t017110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <marf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:28:29 -0600
References: <BB012BD379D7B046ABE1472D8093C61C01CF9478A6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4BBF6B8D.1030901@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <4BBF6B8D.1030901@tana.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <4FA3A0BB-560E-4382-9326-F5D9F6FE7CEA@cybernothing.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:28:21 -0600
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <marf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Subject: Re: [marf] WGLC starting for draft-ietf-marf-base-01
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:28:38 -0000

On Apr 9, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:

> As for using "Reported-URI" for the spamvertized mailbox, I just note that IODEF's draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns (now in LC) calls that "Collection Site". The phrase "a URI to which the report recipient can go for further details", instead, suggests something like
> 
> http://example.com/arf-generators/XYZ-v1.04b/meaning-of-fields.html

Reported-URI should be a URI copied from (or perhaps derived from) the message being reported.  It's not intended for documentation about the report itself.

--
J.D. Falk <jdfalk@returnpath.net>
Return Path Inc