IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-06.txt

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <shmuel+mail-abuse-feedback-report@patriot.net> Mon, 06 February 2012 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <shmuel+gen@patriot.net>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FC221F852B for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:07:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.431, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b23kpi6wXbvp for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.patriot.net (smtp.patriot.net [209.249.176.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C316921F84DD for <marf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ECS60015111 (unknown [69.72.27.134]) (Authenticated sender: shmuel@patriot.net) by smtp.patriot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63714F5808A for <marf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:52:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Shmuel Metz <shmuel+mail-abuse-feedback-report@patriot.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:39:59 -0500
To: marf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20120206051656.8064.8480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Organization: Atid/2
X-CompuServe-Customer: Yes
X-Coriate: NCAE@NewAmerica.org
X-Coriate: Mark Griffith <markgriffith@rocketmail.com>
X-Punge: Micro$oft
X-Terminate: SPA(GIS)
X-Treme: C&C,DWS
X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.18 BETA/60
Message-Id: <20120206155237.63714F5808A@smtp.patriot.net>
Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-06.txt
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@IETF.ORG>
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:07:16 -0000

In <20120206051656.8064.8480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>, on 02/05/2012
   at 09:16 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org said:

>draft-ietf-marf-as-06.txt

In 8.  Generating and Handling Unsolicited Reports, if a MUST is
appropriate in item 6 then surely it is also appropriate in item 12. I
suggest

6.   A report generator MUST provide a way for a report recipient
     to request no further reports be sent to that address,
     unless the provider only accepts abuse complaints in ARF
     format, and MAY provide a way for recipients to change the
     address(es) to which reports about them are sent.

12.  Published abuse mailbox addresses SHOULD NOT reject messages
     not in the ARF format, as generation of ARF messages can
     occasionally be unavailable or not applicable.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email