Re: [marf] Slight change to AS document

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Thu, 19 April 2012 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9A011E80BB for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sMKiiFxx9eH for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9D511E8073 for <marf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B3FD0404C; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:27:18 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1334878038; bh=fzhTs+GQd1PgBhx9EvmkjzmcwugqDz+aYFFv+cMu2Kc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:From:Date:To:Message-ID; b=bny2D1cfqx0ma8RA9MKi6sY3+enHODdj8OF529RLV5fHfypzbSbJpz7o6P0FzRh/e EiFLmbf3QSJf5/RsKAiHl1K+lpE774j75kq2CO+nqvVXo3XRr6QBsDoZmFpM5tMLPb Whhi22eu+VwDy9CNos0eU7VumlfVrM/nBgQG6Wak=
Received: from 60.sub-97-164-75.myvzw.com (60.sub-97-164-75.myvzw.com [97.164.75.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 413D3D0404B; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:27:17 -0500 (CDT)
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FB672@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FB672@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:27:23 -0400
To: "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <81ce01ab-73b2-42f3-aaad-d3d7d7f78349@email.android.com>
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [marf] Slight change to AS document
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:27:19 -0000

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> wrote:

>Fellow MARFers,
>
>IESG Evaluation of the Applicability Statement draft has begun.  One AD
>has provided some feedback that's led me in the direction of merging
>Sections 4 and 5, so that there's one top-level section about solicited
>reports and one about unsolicited reports.  The current arrangement
>makes it look like we spent a lot less time on unsolicited reports,
>when in fact we have but there's not as much to say.  I believe the
>proposed new arrangement improves that somewhat.  There are a couple of
>other minor text changes as a result of the Gen-ART review, but this is
>the most substantive change.
>
>So I plan to do that in the very near future (i.e., late tomorrow)
>unless someone thinks that's a really terrible idea.

I'd have to see the text to know. I think it's very important to keep the distinction between the two concepts.

Scott K