Re: [marf] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-14.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 13 March 2012 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4606221E8017 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qeEENWkypvCX for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF121F8602 for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2966:6846:8d89:4681%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:01:42 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [marf] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-14.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNAWRp3fdSOkcij0yd6kjGSPZLYZZoxspQ
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:01:41 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392808863D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120313215821.9703.21664.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120313215821.9703.21664.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [marf] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-14.txt
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:01:47 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: marf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:marf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:58 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: marf@ietf.org
> Subject: [marf] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-14.txt
> 
> A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
> Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>     Title         : Extensions to DKIM for Failure Reporting
>     Author(s)     : M. Kucherawy
>     Filename      : draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting
>     Pages         : 23
>     Date          : April 21, 2010
> 
> This memo presents extensions to the DomainKeys Identified Mail
>    (DKIM) specification to allow for detailed reporting of message
>    authentication failures in an on-demand fashion.

Handles a second DISCUSS issue having to do with which tags get ignored.  Nothing major.

-MSK