Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-04.txt

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:41 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-04.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Messaging Abuse Reporting
> Format Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Extensions to DKIM for Failure Reporting
> 	Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 18
> 	Date            : 2012-01-23
> 
>    This memo presents extensions to the DomainKeys Identified Mail
>    (DKIM) specification to allow for detailed reporting of message
>    authentication failures in an on-demand fashion.

Changes since the previous version:

- some language tightening with respect to "sender", "signer", etc.

- don't reference the SPF reporting document; they may evolve separately, and there's no need for them to hold each other up

- move all the broken signature reporting into the signature itself by making them extension DKIM-Signature tags, rather than putting them in the key records in the DNS; the revised design doesn't require DNS queries for failed signatures that don't otherwise need them

- remove "rf" (report format) tag for both DKIM and ADSP; assume all generated reports will use ARF

- rename "ri" (report interval) to "rp" (report percentage) for both DKIM and ADSP

- move report generation normative stuff out of Security Considerations and into its own section that covers report generation syntax and transport issues; reference draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report accordingly

- other minor copy editing

Fresh reviews and other comments are most welcome.

-MSK