[martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin
Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Mon, 19 July 2010 18:49 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C723A67A1 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1IzMAwjJg3Pb for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E833A68D5 for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so402702wwb.13 for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0ZtiNpZ81xzjv9QuYLTAGR1tSuwPgZQzuv8lgyYJYoI=; b=lw4EibF13Zg9VpNpspf2xApG3a9zag8Gb31O5O2GqCg1zst+2XPqNj+R9AvXj2cgqt owdkRd6GBbSA5Itm23FiNJ44FzXDcJQESEsOSWQS3cvdA2Ro1XL+Qt4JuQZyJX+THgby iDz+P7lH7AEomXs+SVJC4o9iaX+ujPsxdEbTg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fyk2ePEwK2Mmg0fdw6pAPQ1kWGQybm5GVX2/JZvjZzBpihhzZxSSx/Ug0Gxo7nv88G 1mAtZrGMYIjy4yUZFGFgKAE1TCyhOCKqj5qv/+uy+B2lBCRzcqH+72KrM+/WfhfzVYeV c7PXYwj9JXNEB5fW4NcKEm+ioNrZFRPil9W1o=
Received: by 10.227.138.6 with SMTP id y6mr4432065wbt.162.1279565371086; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Alans-PowerBook-G4-17.local (99-58-71-98.lightspeed.stlsmo.sbcglobal.net [99.58.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g37sm42943874wbg.21.2010.07.19.11.49.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C449E38.2060200@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:49:28 -0500
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:49:18 -0000
I have reviewed the document and believe it is ready to progress with no technical issues. A few minor issues are noted below that could be addressed to improve the document, but aren't worth entering into the tracker. - Alan - Section 5.1: The first time the bnc parameter is introduced, it might be worth explaining it stands for Bulk Number Contact - the first time I read it I thought it stood for Bayonet Neill-Concelman... Section 5.1: There are a couple of "must"s that probably are "MUST"s. Section 5.2: There is some justification why the SIP-PBX MUST support Path, but none is given here why the Registrar MUST support it. Is it for the same reason? Section 5.2: While the SIP-PBX MUST include Proxy-Require:gin, it is possible a registration might arrive at a Registrar with a bnc but no Proxy-Require:gin. Should we define the correct behavior of the Registrar for this case?
- [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin Alan Johnston
- Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini… Adam Roach
- Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini… Alan Johnston
- Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini… Adam Roach
- Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini… Elwell, John
- Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini… Alan Johnston