[Masque] Weekly github digest (MASQUE Working Group summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 29 January 2023 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80095C14E513 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 00:21:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="xEajsu2u"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="BP+wfhQa"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UCqnAt9teWkG for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 00:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE26CC14EB15 for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 00:21:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC89E5C04FC for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:36:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to :sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1674977810; x= 1675064210; bh=JekkPKxZRN2Wvpq4sL1SW9sE95wsTi3r5riOVXmDH20=; b=x Eajsu2uZomRadkjtS44uAz2YDsgReDnMxW870u/MNtWBhJMtbQ4j4Dl68CNzqINN gwgmbVVJbMzKJzvSBLKMvMc4KZfcZu+/cp4iEOdqwpwnZtNc6NGacv9nhBJ3PrGn vEfucEQiB6LawLI6TxMNKt0x6NC361nNWc2tXxDkS9DJAvE5VgzNvpnjAU/vkcIv SQVPx/avwxuChDnRi+PLH4J1p36rwpLI64UDRQ/0UHbiMSLzG17J7QGk5FNmdJzj Mbudy7Wb9wUbGL4MZWOxLLaZaT9hpgcXVI9UpBHCZEY/6oo98LdgfmZVeBjJG/GY S9Fm95BAgRP8qQ/j+dHdw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1674977810; x=1675064210; bh=J ekkPKxZRN2Wvpq4sL1SW9sE95wsTi3r5riOVXmDH20=; b=BP+wfhQaO1m/AMjZO ssjIqUoo66grPt3R81W5RPDNrAS/mSr0XGHpAETVjxsvPQ+2dUvo51AFDWSOb2dM gGeAM9tPB+E1Vhze0DVikeS3H9FDmXml0NTzY5nL7LYEpMHph502DpHy6WzoVXmC AX/+GmCrw366K3Gmtwvokc0Ez/+nXox8sgoQFM2bESHyCzfxW8DhaVS9ZULpYEBZ aTbSLFr5RnjGMhzLlqltg0q6XvpZcEh2V2pXRzaTAfftA/SlnipiYZJEZuiRjTIC 4QBmgemV2TGk3UYV1s6S6Y6jWS7U121f/fAHwwti93t9VaPdgu7Kcs5yQIOb/Ybz IRTFQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:EiLWY1uiUg-h_nBcVHXwGUJ8iWrOb37FtuTmLSqpmwhOjKS47aPCeQ> <xme:EiLWY-f-5qF871JSiMGoY3FjE7k88i4jcUZu6BiiqM3ZhDP0FiQrLU1KtnLBj_w27 LUBZqv1OSKaKva2IQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:EiLWY4xqsr6jIsHcDLoCviYHdQFW9eQGRVcCRaB1685Z_WoelAhjoilzV3DNdl9_HnX9CxcTZg85RXtlaAOkkyLkH4mSYbR4U0sdcG3N3xqSnbWft8GQiqhlA7so_GTc_AC7>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddvledguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:EiLWY8ORpGNjpm8sUxsB4gBC975UIiLFmxzhxJFDg339GV2ymvBFLg> <xmx:EiLWY18GD_5uQ7vs3x5HCIqBNYjiH1FAuDUSwvOqi4Jy0hFeXw-6SQ> <xmx:EiLWY8WsmW5X84EsBdCBUT11jL9-84M7SsfOFuaf-ByLPAa-YFsCqg> <xmx:EiLWY6KHPxeq6_Eim1Crlxh02Qv558gkvX394Jnaz8ngr4lj2fficA>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6435775560053656776=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: masque@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20230129082129.EE26CC14EB15@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 00:21:29 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/9myjqFrUGB6F_9KCgoWRF2pMZgc>
Subject: [Masque] Weekly github digest (MASQUE Working Group summary)
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 08:21:34 -0000



Issues
------
* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip (+11/-3/💬35)
  11 issues created:
  - Potential DoS vector via spamming ADDRESS_REQUEST (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/106 
  - s/lesser/less than (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/105 
  - Is the list of addresses in ADDRESS_REQUEST or ADDRESS_ASSIGN significant? (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/104 
  - No feedback for ADDRESS_REQUEST denied? (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/103 
  - What are the expectations for a receiver of capsules that break the MUSTs (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/102 
  - ipproto is in the range of 0-255 but capsules can only use 4 or 6 (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/101 
  - Slightly ambiguous about how to process a request with a bad path (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/100 
  - Are you planning on changing the Capsule type values prior to publication? (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/99 
  - No examples in section 4 (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/98 
  - Lifetime of the IP tunnel (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/97 
  - How should we NAK an ADDRESS_REQUEST? (by asedeno)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/95 

  11 issues received 35 new comments:
  - #106 Potential DoS vector via spamming ADDRESS_REQUEST (2 by DavidSchinazi, asedeno)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/106 
  - #105 s/lesser/less than (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/105 
  - #104 Does the order of address requests in ADDRESS_REQUEST or address assigned's in ADDRESS_ASSIGN have semantics? (9 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue, achernya, asedeno)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/104 
  - #103 No feedback for ADDRESS_REQUEST denied? (5 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue, achernya, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/103 
  - #102 What are the expectations for a receiver of capsules that break the MUSTs (2 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/102 
  - #101 ipproto is in the range of 0-255 but capsules can only use 4 or 6 (2 by LPardue, asedeno)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/101 
  - #100 Slightly ambiguous about how to process a request with a bad path (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/100 
  - #99 Are you planning on changing the Capsule type values prior to publication? (5 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/99 
  - #98 No examples in section 4 (2 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/98 
  - #97 Lifetime of the IP tunnel (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/97 
  - #95 How should we NAK an ADDRESS_REQUEST? (5 by DavidSchinazi, asedeno, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/95 

  3 issues closed:
  - s/lesser/less than https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/105 
  - ipproto is in the range of 0-255 but capsules can only use 4 or 6 https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/101 
  - How should we NAK an ADDRESS_REQUEST? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/95 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip (+3/-3/💬0)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - Edits to ADDRESS_REQUEST regarding replies (by asedeno)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/108 
  - s/lesser/less than/ (by asedeno)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/107 
  - Explain how to send a rejection for an address request (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/96 

  3 pull requests merged:
  - s/lesser/less than/
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/107 
  - Explain how to send a rejection for an address request
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/96 
  - Add ADDRESS_REQUEST Capsule to VPN example
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/94 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip