Re: [Masque] MASQUE and Tor "pluggable transports"

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EB1120116 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIEfuPhbJubg for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5AB120033 for <masque@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 62so60600705lfa.8 for <masque@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yx++nNKbAHOdMm3j/EY2QeacroA0W7nUCdiqDIeN3Zs=; b=oxuKLvmplrEwN4McjzRX+su8UJ928ZSwqhZsVW0vz1u8JFrg1iaee9yzvf1a+DFvr+ qAH6GiAucr4P9dryei2LVOgxvs4owWce1otCmGl3Sq+2tDbWKzW4QJwtnlnpfP2zyj/q VBJpQwju4MUV+g5HsAGkZTQAM2/O0CwkVSOipOT7mmZ5oYEiNhWifGIhkXUmCl/ve7H4 m5CQP4tC9yDskBnDl0yb1246HTF7adVzpa4GjkUvTsiwnqdxlILUWi0DewOSB2opNO2K 1kAUpbFMsGWp7viaudsgGpg7GTEg03AtsR2PpjVAIuqfcA5tLPMLscQ3YafD+MEm9y4U IsnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yx++nNKbAHOdMm3j/EY2QeacroA0W7nUCdiqDIeN3Zs=; b=L+r24/fecf57tbnU8GjHYmAJs8k7eXBE/7FNH+CaTwiGMBT8K8ttyToRTlTw5wkOFT WEKYrHNrFFMBXeOZuUn8EvceitLfkiz7JFDVMxjO9LX733KNMB2TP+gS/pbpD6zunCoT Sqcbxkey1v15ymi8CMDuwsgna6ap47GRFi4KY3qXa/80R9kyB+OLYqi9wXro30SwbLN0 OOVb17muyzTqE/zBuLBJAQHwfeg+ezpW99Scjo6JYMLqfG6cP9uQFyxGv7lOOJNiW/Q+ DYsvxfaY2KV1Wo9APiOwCoyVCms5PRV0X15zlR/0cJ1hC9WAsD4TLbkWVx3kMNqCMt2p 7n7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqYv5jNJgWq+JuLTbPinMtiee557Oqm8+42XmV8kz0byC18kVX 5AyZf80Db3dMquIAc47hQcwQGD+JfCOTGO19lMngpkis
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyYuIZ3JXvRGsepdInnLCk/aIuMLmO0MS745bp57Io2Y0LXDfhfUlF37LOfKcRpwoZUIMMzhUbxiEIF7m+xD8o=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:428c:: with SMTP id p134mr6845281lfa.166.1565226811025; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190806162044.etph52mdghi6mtlb@nymity.ch> <CAHbrMsDCGzVeCj3v0CX6Q-zDNi_beEymA_Z0eKfyWYY933yBWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG3f7MgynP7+fTYA_uojWxvzbMvbgrqfkZPFL4MvatAXNKF1WQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+7JLSpNMfSH8520sbFDmd2=Ec+1sV92c3-QUi0r_-tkhA@mail.gmail.com> <20190807220514.6e4h5hkzrnkqpfpx@nymity.ch> <CAPDSy+4UjFSHHF9P2TJ09YJsdpNfu6t2eBZanwKVmzAjRp-Kkg@mail.gmail.com> <506ee224-ba19-4c60-abca-8090538377c3@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <506ee224-ba19-4c60-abca-8090538377c3@www.fastmail.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:13:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+7cFcg0ujrL+jGHpsmxJ671kumdwZJ5+rktSg0t=2FxTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: masque@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000107662058f90c414"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/BqSJmrc2_IsOxjtwnqUbDtp4Y8U>
Subject: Re: [Masque] MASQUE and Tor "pluggable transports"
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 01:13:35 -0000

>
>
> > That would require changing how QUIC authenticates,
>
> How so?  QUIC doesn't really dictate how you authenticate.  Maybe some
> implementations would have to change, but they would need to do that for
> tunneling anyway (as they already do for proxying).
>

Sorry what I meant was "That would require changing how current
implementations of QUIC authenticate" - today most folks are implementing
QUICv1 which has quic-transport and quic-tls. We'd need implementations of
a separate new QUIC version that uses a different authentication scheme.

David