IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] Updated proposed charter text

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 06 April 2020 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E13A0A8A for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLY2TKIECh-L for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BAAC3A0A53 for <masque@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id m2so102106otr.1 for <masque@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RX06LH/p3E7xZYVruVv05mr8lYvEtDhsJorfIzpJ+R0=; b=KB+XQOLKBz24Gbl10MX/e0sFrrkvWR7POXL4vRhTXlm4zWS/PjpTscNZ/tihRX1XPb PxHnNaZGAzm3YLUqo7ue7DephAzeTTB/8NDVKWQkUZk2yiEcljBIHBOcgsb/fTIz8V5D kOqDeHPGDJDnPsNrugLGq+IrI+gDJXBxsruS2286FiqaIwQCLOxBGcJxkgG6mwMIHUWQ Z5C0A+8PgopQceVJuMhOGzOwctVfWPGR/eydcU4nYOZLFeeOY9vPgl2wIg3FpW5MN/+N 0j1OVNcqkNoYSBUrf/rTKvNNefkr8JNWFKhCt/4rXrKSUyMIppBV3kw9cMc5RuAY5SPS W/TA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RX06LH/p3E7xZYVruVv05mr8lYvEtDhsJorfIzpJ+R0=; b=SyYbZrw2zLAn0HONZyvBL0DkHec8qcUZJ9Yp0kss1cNfQ9f11nihkZWY7l0pyVDFtp H3/6JIniE5varsGp/6DXH1s6D9Gij8hmWnbc9kJMuoMvZShVf6/hPrGmWDuMr1z0M5pO gM3DM1SQ26j759OWbjR8im5s1hI2ozkaIST1RPVRwLfhSaOzKqmzZqotbr3GxuRpTVt7 cSRQPPukuaxIcrQXNaKzNF56i6h14sZKu2k1rFhumSe0iENF8tFbB5gljGPNlVKWW++L n2a+RqkyavM3DT5QVn7noyt+4P+HaWXyio6NJfesnEZbqSvtZNGQ7CH+Sj/Dqt2pk+ER TTzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZzZVkPD6wZCy372rPTTDRnwtPciKNFdNBia2CgaMNW5F1G0nrA eI5UC2NBgDQD2Yn8NH/MtxXY4UD53bvylzZveSxK7PTp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLVAKYyJO39ZOZ7/o3RRFRuOvSuMM3SXRnXe8rMa30OBeurBTlnbj61jsN74WdGLsuU/Zo63iYNkX81G9zOEIM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c94:: with SMTP id c20mr19192715otr.49.1586192635311; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <89136f8b-70bd-40a0-b6d1-0e8a62a50ece@www.fastmail.com> <HE1PR07MB442601004BE58A00FD2D6B04E2C70@HE1PR07MB4426.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <30d32d26-7a6d-48d9-92b7-326ad08e5f08@www.fastmail.com> <2B89357E-FA42-48D7-9645-781CBE912DFC@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBNC8qDLtovoymAt771edBJnM2d-Otq0rjOFdgxR4YsohQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oYUdiipkLqHuvnJXmWxc7guPnW3PA-wLK5nEQU8W6p=UA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oYUdiipkLqHuvnJXmWxc7guPnW3PA-wLK5nEQU8W6p=UA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAEescbkvrf_ZSsJSTWbARcBTY4=n-ohzBieQfBbq7kVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>, "masque@ietf.org" <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000092b90205a2a24007"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/CA5-wNtXr9OVaW0isWghDoe3zx4>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Updated proposed charter text
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:03:58 -0000

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:59 AM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> QUIC requires an authenticated negotiation of the application protocol and
> we use ALPN for that today. There is no mechanism to my knowledge that
> would allow the creation of just a QUIC connection, and I don't even think
> MASQUE requires that.
>

If I am reading RFC 7301 correctly, the way to do that would be register an
appropriate protocol identifier, which specifically disclaimed it being an
application identifiable by the QUIC-layer protocol machinery.  The MIME
Media Type parallel would be application/octet-stream.

Including such a thing in the set of supported protocols would have all of
the problems previous identified, so this is hardly going to solve MASQUE's
problem, but we should note that it is not impossible and that there may
arise some need for this at a later time.

regards,

Ted Hardie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email