[Masque] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for {draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10}
CC @ekline

## Comments

### S3.2

* Possibly the definition of Capsule Type should mention the IANA registry
  via a short reference ("; see Section 5.4").

* If new 2xx codes are defined in the future, are they required to state
  what their suitability is in scenarios upgrading to Capsule Protocol use?

  If so, is there any additional guidance beyond what one could divine
  from a reading of the 2nd to last paragraph?

  (New 2xx codes seem extremely unlikely, but is such a thing completely
   impossible?)