IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Masque] CONNECT-IP

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8433A1285 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Dwq9ph4RETe for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDDE33A1286 for <masque@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id a85so9686898pfa.0 for <masque@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5GCVCFpoveFb0DqbS3MP5u/pEweEVVoz9jbAHtUFT70=; b=I+FT1xhQ9/AoHUCmzwU0JE2wzNloQdvMrAW8CUocqv6hy4NGpsIgyFF5Vkvw20idRc f4MbrPYO/m8oBBim8xjnbPIm9VmL8sb8lW2tRYsAxAaWoeDOuUspqQUrL+qSLWKCZqjM aOSr5bKAXvWYz/fI7Ee+yOx8t9b0U6awLNcGYHxuvyF3zeg/rYOrKL340OQJtOdNKMdX sOQh9rBt2u/QDwgT79zx0lJmwhTElDJyM6JMfz6Y/oVMaMDBs/35dFc3UTFI1JRTrgzN si1/460IDNjYZptHMKeLyMSgFaBMhtbq/p2/zn6pt7IQa3qYB9AFvCgpDgK5hSSFyl4U hIeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5GCVCFpoveFb0DqbS3MP5u/pEweEVVoz9jbAHtUFT70=; b=j/0IR1wgPGY2R8dUaEeVRHMx9R5E2Nq4Qf+p5bdIL4VZWlNYG46KmiCYAYPZ0hih1B /vLtpUPQ+DAGKsgr4QIcIkQjjXqr9xkpjMw9rhE5DxiksGPNE8+FuY+8woc8Exz/Vnr4 U6N0YGq8K23kn++1srJ3LsdzKb0mNTYgSrdJJ+RJP9vpkQ5Fg3azyaFf5cprj//qLa1y vaHz4+pquulF1bOU4VlHRr4IVku9lLmJ8gsIEokwNGKCcdebrB0NBbHcz14xAsAu82xp 158HPPVThgH4qeQK7d8m0hAz3MZzwakgLabexT+eMcet2pgE8aVFDnveHsOtpeLy1FG6 LnfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qRUuAveeo+4j6njW99zi3kf9WyLSdbd9++n7BKef+QmzxpBsx fLuCIVGq1ZuB1KVBDypFvZwYQUWRxDEFymICsHsnFSsDPKc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywlGOxyLvJ2XVVB/vRaOv0SxMxPkC0I8DxSk0yKBwQ4GkX6DmhnLhuSNRuaMz0AnuBjlEwee80uGK3L8jO1Y4=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5c48:: with SMTP id n8mr28894129pgm.411.1618266923977; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:35:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+75YfiHE4BDa75GsTe75xS1ADtczfYRL3_SHZt48+OxiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: MASQUE <masque@ietf.org>
Cc: Dallas McCall <dallasmccall@google.com>, Alex Chernyakhovsky <achernya@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027d01705bfce217b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/XY3d08zPR9xQ-teaT8rZA6ge3mo>
Subject: [Masque] CONNECT-IP
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:35:29 -0000

Hi MASQUE enthusiasts,

At IETF 110, there appeared to be a change in the MASQUE working group
mindset where the IP Proxying Requirements doc seemed to have produced its
desired outcome, and that it might now be the time to switch gears to
proposing designs and solutions. In order to help with this, the authors of
draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs>
have written up a proposal that matches those requirements:
draft-cms-masque-connect-ip
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cms-masque-connect-ip>. Our
intent was to build a minimal protocol that met the requirements previously
discussed in the working group.

Please let us know what you think!
David

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email