Re: [Masque] Martin Duke's Yes on charter-ietf-masque-02-01: (with COMMENT)

BTW, in case anyone is wondering, the diff between the existing charter and
the proposed new one is here:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?url_1=https://www.ietf.org/charter/charter-ietf-masque-02.txt&url_2=https://www.ietf.org/charter/charter-ietf-masque-02-01.txt

All it does is add "tunneling of Ethernet packets" to the initial set of
extensions, and requires us to "coordinate with IEEE 802.3 to make sure
Ethernet concepts are correctly represented".

No one's asking but I do personally support this change :-)

Hope this helps,
David

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 9:49 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-masque-02-01: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-masque/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is a minor edit to add CONNECT-ETHERNET and coordination with IEEE
> 802.3.
>
>
>
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>